Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Page image classifier fine-tuned on century-spanning archives of scanned documents for further content-specific processing

Summary

A page image classifier fine-tuned on over 48,000 annotated historical document images achieves 99.16% accuracy using RegNetY-16GF, enabling automated sorting for OCR and data extraction. CLIP models underperform on unlabeled data despite high test accuracy.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Kateryna Lutsai, Pavel Stra\v{n}\'ak, David Nov\'ak, Dana K\v{r}iv\'ankov\'a
Page image classifier fine-tuned on century-spanning archives of scanned documents for further content-specific processing
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2606.07558] Page image classifier fine-tuned on century-spanning archives of scanned documents for further content-specific processing

[Submitted on 25 May 2026]

Title:Page image classifier fine-tuned on century-spanning archives of scanned documents for further content-specific processing

View a PDF of the paper titled Page image classifier fine-tuned on century-spanning archives of scanned documents for further content-specific processing, by Kateryna Lutsai and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Purpose: Digitization projects in the humanities produce vast, heterogeneous archives of historical documents, making manual sorting impractical at scale. This work addresses the need for an automated system to classify scanned page images based on visual content type - text, tables, and graphics - enabling content-specific downstream processing such as Optical Character Recognition (OCR) or structured data extraction. Methods: An image classification system was developed and evaluated on a dataset of over 48,000 annotated historical page images from century-old Czech archaeological archives, refined through four successive annotation stages with domain-expert review. A Random Forest Classifier baseline was established using hand-crafted image features. Subsequently, deep learning architectures were fine-tuned and compared: Convolutional Neural Networks (EfficientNetV2, RegNetY), Vision and Document Image Transformers (ViT, DiT), and multimodal CLIP models. An 11-category label scheme was designed collaboratively with domain experts and evaluated via five-fold cross-validation. Results: The feature-based baseline achieved approximately 75% accuracy. Fine-tuned CNNs and Transformers substantially outperformed it, with RegNetY-16GF achieving 99.16% and ViT-large 99.12% Top-1 accuracy on the held-out test set. CLIP ViT-B/16 reached 99.14% with optimized text descriptions. Conclusion: Image-only models, particularly RegNetY-16GF, deliver near-perfect classification accuracy and produce consistent labels across 649,508 unlabeled archival pages with over 90% inter-model agreement. Fine-tuned CLIP, despite competitive test-set accuracy, showed under 65% agreement with image-only models on unlabeled data, making it less suitable for deployment. The final models, annotated dataset, and software are publicly available under open-source licenses.

Comments: 29 pages, 19 figures, 13 tables. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2507.21114

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Digital Libraries (cs.DL)

MSC classes: 68T07

Cite as: arXiv:2606.07558 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2606.07558v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07558

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Kateryna Lutsai Bc [view email] [v1] Mon, 25 May 2026 08:36:36 UTC (8,474 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Page image classifier fine-tuned on century-spanning archives of scanned documents for further content-specific processing, by Kateryna Lutsai and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.DL

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Near-perfect classification accuracy (99.16% with RegNetY-16GF) on historical document page images.
  • Dataset of over 48,000 annotated images from century-old Czech archives.
  • CLIP models show over 90% test accuracy but less than 65% agreement with image-only models on unlabeled data.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.