Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

PAANI: On-Device Visual Evidence Fusion and Explainable Guidance for River Robot Simulation

Summary

PAANI is an on-device perception-to-guidance architecture for river monitoring robots, combining YOLO11n detection, MobileNetV3 Small segmentation, and explainable corridor policies on an Arduino UNO Q. It achieves strong accuracy but distinguishes model performance from validated on-water collision avoidance.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Savio Cardoz, Santhiya Rajan
PAANI: On-Device Visual Evidence Fusion and Explainable Guidance for River Robot Simulation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 17 Sep 2026]

Title:PAANI : On Device Visual Evidence Fusion and Explainable Guidance for River Robot Simulation

View a PDF of the paper titled PAANI : On Device Visual Evidence Fusion and Explainable Guidance for River Robot Simulation, by Savio Cardoz and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Mobile river monitoring robots must interpret obstacles and water boundaries that geographic waypoints alone cannot describe. On resource constrained platforms, converting imperfect visual predictions into timely and inspectable guidance is a distinct challenge. An object label or steering command does not explain which evidence supports a decision or when that evidence is unreliable. We present PAANI, an on-device perception to guidance architecture that combines a project trained YOLO11n detector and a custom MobileNetV3 Small semantic segmenter with timestamp aligned evidence fusion on Arduino UNO Q. Bounded tracking supplies object persistence, while an explicit corridor policy combines surface labels, accepted detections, urgency and mask uncertainty. Each final advisory exposes its contributing evidence and policy reasons. ROS 2 interfaces connect the local AI pipeline to a separate Gazebo vessel, localization and control testbed. Training uses 10,000 WaterScenes images for four-class detection and 1,127 MaSTr1325 images for segmentation, including 198 segmentation validation images. The selected FP32 ONNX models occupy 14.817 MB. Detector checkpoint test mAP at 0.5 IoU is 0.7388, while the separately evaluated rectangular ONNX export achieves validation mAP at 0.5 IoU of 0.7367. Segmentation ONNX validation mIoU is 0.9750. A five-minute UNO Q recording produced median and 95th percentile pipeline latencies of 467.8 ms and 580.3 ms at a configured 0.5 Hz cadence. The evaluation also identifies black input misclassification and a sampling rate mismatch that prevents the diagnostic apparent motion estimator from collecting sufficient evidence. These results support an inspectable and reusable edge robotics foundation while clearly distinguishing model accuracy and on-board execution from validated on-water collision avoidance.

Comments: 20 pages, 8 figures, 11 tables. Includes system and AI architecture diagrams, model-training results, qualitative evaluations, and Arduino UNO Q deployment measurements. Project code, trained models, ONNX artifacts, logs, and reproducibility documentation are available at this https URL

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.22353 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.22353v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22353

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Santhiya Rajan [view email] [v1] Thu, 17 Sep 2026 09:15:50 UTC (771 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled PAANI : On Device Visual Evidence Fusion and Explainable Guidance for River Robot Simulation, by Savio Cardoz and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • PAANI fuses visual evidence from a YOLO11n detector and MobileNetV3 Small segmenter on an Arduino UNO Q.
  • The system uses timestamp-aligned fusion and an explicit corridor policy to produce inspectable guidance.
  • Models total 14.817 MB; detector [email protected] is 0.7388 and segmentation mIoU is 0.9750.
  • Median pipeline latency is 467.8 ms at 0.5 Hz, with identified issues in black input misclassification and sampling rate mismatch.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.