Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Our AI started a cafe in Stockholm

Summary

Andon Labs’ AI-managed cafe in Stockholm made amusing yet problematic mistakes, like ordering 120 eggs with no stove and submitting an inaccurate sketch for a permit. The experiment raises ethical concerns about wasting human time without consent, prompting calls for human oversight.

Our AI started a cafe in Stockholm
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

Our AI started a cafe in Stockholm

Simon Willison’s Weblog

Subscribe

Sponsored by: MongoDB — Join MongoDB.local London 2026 on 7 May to learn how teams move AI from prototype to production.

5th May 2026 - Link Blog

Our AI started a cafe in Stockholm (via) Andon Labs previously started an AI-run retail store in San Francisco. Now they're running a similar experiment in Stockholm, Sweden, only this time it's a cafe.

These experiments are interesting, and often throw out amusing anecdotes:

During the first week of inventory, Mona ordered 120 eggs even though the café has no stove. When the staff told her they couldn’t cook them, she suggested using the high-speed oven, until they pointed out the eggs would likely explode. She also tried to solve the problem of fresh tomatoes being spoiled too fast by ordering 22.5 kg of canned tomatoes for the fresh sandwiches. The baristas eventually started a “Hall of Shame”, a shelf visible to customers with all the weird things Mona ordered, including 6,000 napkins, 3,000 nitrile gloves, 9L coconut milk, and industrial-sized trash bags.

Where they lose their shine is when these AI managers start wasting the time of human beings who have not opted into the experiment:

She also successfully applied for an outdoor seating permit through the Police e-service, which didn’t require BankID. Her first submission included a sketch she had generated herself, despite having never seen the street outside the café. Unsurprisingly, the Police sent it back for revision. [...]

When she makes a mistake, she often sends multiple emails to suppliers with the subject “EMERGENCY” to cancel or change the order.

I don't think it's ethical to run experiments like this that affect real-world systems and steal time from people.

I'm reminded of the incident last year where the AI Village experiment infuriated Rob Pike by sending him unsolicited gratitude emails as an "act of kindness". That was just an unwanted email - asking suppliers to correct mistakes that were made without a human-in-the-loop or wasting police time with slop diagrams feels a whole lot worse to me.

I think experiments like this need to keep their own human operators in-the-loop for outbound actions that affect other people.

Posted 5th May 2026 at 10:14 pm

Recent articles

LLM 0.32a0 is a major backwards-compatible refactor - 29th April 2026

Tracking the history of the now-deceased OpenAI Microsoft AGI clause - 27th April 2026

DeepSeek V4 - almost on the frontier, a fraction of the price - 24th April 2026

This is a link post by Simon Willison, posted on 5th May 2026.

ai 2003

generative-ai 1775

llms 1740

ai-agents 110

ai-ethics 298

Monthly briefing

Sponsor me for $10/month and get a curated email digest of the month's most important LLM developments.

Pay me to send you less!

Sponsor & subscribe

Disclosures

Colophon

©

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI manager Mona ordered 120 eggs despite the cafe lacking a stove
  • Mona submitted a self-drawn sketch for an outdoor seating permit, which was rejected
  • The experiment wasted time of suppliers and police, sparking ethical debate
  • Author advocates for human-in-the-loop for actions affecting others

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.