Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

ORDER: A Fictitious-World Benchmark for Domain-Adaptive Embodied AI

Summary

arXiv:2609.22285v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adapting language models to new domains via continual pre-training raises a basic evaluation problem: if the training corpus overlaps with what the model already knows, performance gains cannot be cleanly attributed to new learning rather than pre-existing knowledge. This matters most for knowledge-intensive, task-light (KHTL) robot deployments - pharmaceutical dispensing, hazardous-material handling, facility-specific protocols, where the physical task is simple but the governing rules are proprietary and safety-critical, and where extensive live testing is costly or unsafe. We introduce ORDER (Ontology-driven Decision-making for Embodied Reasoning), a benchmark built on a fictitious world: a 342,069-token synthetic corpus defining a self-c…

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Sai Krishna Reddy Sathi, Anuj Tiwari
ORDER: A Fictitious-World Benchmark for Domain-Adaptive Embodied AI
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 13 Sep 2026]

Title:ORDER: A Fictitious-World Benchmark for Domain-Adaptive Embodied AI

View a PDF of the paper titled ORDER: A Fictitious-World Benchmark for Domain-Adaptive Embodied AI, by Sai Krishna Reddy Sathi and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Adapting language models to new domains via continual pre-training raises a basic evaluation problem: if the training corpus overlaps with what the model already knows, performance gains cannot be cleanly attributed to new learning rather than pre-existing knowledge. This matters most for knowledge-intensive, task-light (KHTL) robot deployments - pharmaceutical dispensing, hazardous-material handling, facility-specific protocols, where the physical task is simple but the governing rules are proprietary and safety-critical, and where extensive live testing is costly or unsafe. We introduce ORDER (Ontology-driven Decision-making for Embodied Reasoning), a benchmark built on a fictitious world: a 342,069-token synthetic corpus defining a self-consistent physics that cannot appear in any model's pre-training data. ORDER pairs a 500-question knowledge test (ORDER-BENCH) with a harder compositional task, ORDER-SPATIAL: ordering objects for safe manipulation across both familiar and entirely novel scenes. GPT-4.1 without adaptation scores below chance on ORDER-SPATIAL (Kendall's tau = 0.441), showing its priors actively conflict with the invented physics. After continual pre-training, small models improve substantially on both familiar and novel scenes alike evidence of genuine world-model induction rather than memorization. We then carry this through to a robot pipeline: models that answer the knowledge test well often cannot produce valid, executable plans without a further skill-adaptation stage, after which small, fully offline models outperform GPT-4.1 even when GPT-4.1 is given retrieval access to the same rules (Kendall's tau = 0.848 vs. 0.606), on a full perception-to-execution loop demonstrated on a simulated iiwa7 arm with human-in-the-loop correction. Throughout, ORDER-SPATIAL performance, not knowledge-test accuracy is what predicts real plan quality.

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.22285 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.22285v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22285

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Sai Krishna Reddy Sathi [view email] [v1] Sun, 13 Sep 2026 07:21:22 UTC (2,657 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled ORDER: A Fictitious-World Benchmark for Domain-Adaptive Embodied AI, by Sai Krishna Reddy Sathi and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.22285v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adapting language models to new domains via continual pre-training raises a basic evaluation problem: if the training corpus overla…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.