Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Optimal Correction Sets for Provable Redress of Contestable Causal Discovery

Summary

Fabrizio Russo and four co-authors formulate the repair of conditional-independence facts as a minimum-cost correction problem implemented in Answer Set Programming, yielding OptABA-PC, which offers inspectable repairs, conflict-based justifications, and formally guaranteed redress when users contest a release.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Fabrizio Russo, Giuseppe Mazzotta, Carmine Dodaro, Francesco Ricca, Francesca Toni
Optimal Correction Sets for Provable Redress of Contestable Causal Discovery
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 23 Oct 2026]

Title:Optimal Correction Sets for Provable Redress of Contestable Causal Discovery

View a PDF of the paper titled Optimal Correction Sets for Provable Redress of Contestable Causal Discovery, by Fabrizio Russo and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Constraint-based causal discovery relies on conditional-independence (CI) tests that may conflict in finite samples, leaving no causal graph that satisfies them all. Causal Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) makes these tests explicit as defeasible commitments, and offers correspondence guarantees with a subset of them, but its existing repair procedure releases facts heuristically and offers no formal response to a user's contestation of a release. We argue that contestable causal discovery requires an inspectable repair object, a justification for it, and a predictable revision procedure for such contestations. We therefore formulate CI-fact repair as a minimum-cost correction problem and implement it in Answer Set Programming (ASP). Building on Causal ABA, we provide a compact and efficient ASP encoding of causal consistency, with soundness and completeness guarantees, and a two-way projection correspondence between optimal stable models and minimum-cost correction sets. These results establish fidelity to retained facts, subset-minimality and cost optimality of the repair, conflict-based justifications for released facts, and formally guaranteed redress under user contestations. An empirical evaluation supports the formal account: OptABA-PC retains more correct facts, reduces ambiguity in the compatible outputs, and improves graph reconstruction over Causal ABA on common benchmarks.

Comments: 41 pages including appendix

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.33138 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.33138v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33138

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Fabrizio Russo [view email] [v1] Fri, 23 Oct 2026 16:01:53 UTC (75 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Optimal Correction Sets for Provable Redress of Contestable Causal Discovery, by Fabrizio Russo and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • CI-fact repair is cast as a minimum-cost correction problem with a compact, sound and complete ASP encoding of causal consistency.
  • A two-way projection correspondence between optimal stable models and minimum-cost correction sets establishes fidelity, subset-minimality, and cost optimality.
  • OptABA-PC retains more correct facts, reduces ambiguity among compatible outputs, and improves graph reconstruction over Causal ABA on common benchmarks.
  • The 41-page paper (with appendix) was submitted to arXiv cs.AI on 23 October 2026.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.