Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

On the Clock: Towards Punctual and Productive Time-Budgeted AI Agents

Summary

arXiv:2610.10833v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study whether small LLM agents can operate effectively under explicit wall-clock time budgets by both respecting the allocated runtime and using available time productively. We evaluate Qwen3.6-27B on five competitions from MLE-Bench Lite and Qwen3-4B on Zork I (Jericho), two agentic benchmarks where additional computational time can meaningfully improve performance. In the simplest setting, where the budget is stated only in the prompt, agents fail to translate the stated budget into controlled use of time. These failures arise from gaps in time awareness, since the harness provides no timing feedback, but also because they cannot reliably anticipate the duration of actions, and do not have a learned mapping from available time to an app…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Aaron Wang, Neelabh Madan, Vlad Sobal, Matthew Trager, Michael Kleinman, Elman Mansimov, Wei Xia, Stefano Soatto
On the Clock: Towards Punctual and Productive Time-Budgeted AI Agents
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 7 Oct 2026]

Title:On the Clock: Towards Punctual and Productive Time-Budgeted AI Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled On the Clock: Towards Punctual and Productive Time-Budgeted AI Agents, by Aaron Wang and 7 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We study whether small LLM agents can operate effectively under explicit wall-clock time budgets by both respecting the allocated runtime and using available time productively. We evaluate Qwen3.6-27B on five competitions from MLE-Bench Lite and Qwen3-4B on Zork I (Jericho), two agentic benchmarks where additional computational time can meaningfully improve performance. In the simplest setting, where the budget is stated only in the prompt, agents fail to translate the stated budget into controlled use of time. These failures arise from gaps in time awareness, since the harness provides no timing feedback, but also because they cannot reliably anticipate the duration of actions, and do not have a learned mapping from available time to an appropriate strategy. We investigate two complementary classes of interventions: harness-based mechanisms that expose timing information and enforce deadlines, and reinforcement learning with budget-aware rewards. Injecting timing information through the harness substantially improves budget adherence for Qwen3.6-27B without measurable loss in performance, while enforcement hooks tighten adherence further. RL with GRPO achieves near-perfect budget adherence on Zork I and generalizes to held-out budgets not seen during training, but does not improve task performance over the untrained harness on MLE-Bench. Once agents are made to respect the budget, they still fail to use additional time to improve task performance. RL-trained policies learn when to stop but often fill extra time with repeated actions, and GRPO training on multiple budgets tends to collapse toward the strategy learned for the shortest budget. Our results reveal a gap between time adherence and productive time allocation, which remains a central challenge for budget-conditioned agents.

Comments: Accepted at the NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Resource-Aware Agentic AI. 23 pages

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.10833 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.10833v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10833

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Vlad Sobal [view email] [v1] Wed, 7 Oct 2026 19:35:08 UTC (152 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled On the Clock: Towards Punctual and Productive Time-Budgeted AI Agents, by Aaron Wang and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.10833v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study whether small LLM agents can operate effectively under explicit wall-clock time budgets by both respecting the allocated r…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.