On Hamming-Lipschitz Type Stability of the Subdominant (Minmax) Ultrametric: Theory and Simple Proofs
arXiv:2608.04014v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The subdominant (minmax) ultrametric is a canonical tree-structured summary of a dissimilarity matrix, arising equivalently as the ultrametric induced by single-linkage clustering. While its classical stability theory is usually formulated in $\ell_\infty$ or Gromov--Hausdorff terms, such bounds are poorly suited to sparse perturbations that alter only a few pairwise distances. We develop an $\ell_0$-type stability theory for this operator. Our analysis shows that sparse edits propagate only through the minimum spanning tree (MST): a pairwise ultrametric value can change only if its tree path crosses an edited edge or a cut newly exposed by an edited off-tree edge. This yields a sharp per-edit exposed-cut score and a tree-only global envelope, leading to Hamming--Lipschitz bounds on the number of ultrametric entries that can change. We also prove sharpness results showing that this dependence on tree geometry is unavoidable: under strict cut separation the tree-edge bound is attained exactly, and for off-tree edits there are explicit families in which one edited distance changes $\Theta(n^2)$ ultrametric entries. In addition, we prove a conditional near-additivity principle for multiple edits under certified large per-edit changed regions and negligible aggregate overlap. Experiments on deep-embedding graphs show that the resulting structural scores provide useful vulnerability diagnostics for hierarchical representations.
-->
[Submitted on 27 Apr 2026]
Title:On Hamming-Lipschitz Type Stability of the Subdominant (Minmax) Ultrametric: Theory and Simple Proofs
View a PDF of the paper titled On Hamming-Lipschitz Type Stability of the Subdominant (Minmax) Ultrametric: Theory and Simple Proofs, by Alokendu Mazumder and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The subdominant (minmax) ultrametric is a canonical tree-structured summary of a dissimilarity matrix, arising equivalently as the ultrametric induced by single-linkage clustering. While its classical stability theory is usually formulated in $\ell_\infty$ or Gromov--Hausdorff terms, such bounds are poorly suited to sparse perturbations that alter only a few pairwise distances. We develop an $\ell_0$-type stability theory for this operator. Our analysis shows that sparse edits propagate only through the minimum spanning tree (MST): a pairwise ultrametric value can change only if its tree path crosses an edited edge or a cut newly exposed by an edited off-tree edge. This yields a sharp per-edit exposed-cut score and a tree-only global envelope, leading to Hamming--Lipschitz bounds on the number of ultrametric entries that can change. We also prove sharpness results showing that this dependence on tree geometry is unavoidable: under strict cut separation the tree-edge bound is attained exactly, and for off-tree edits there are explicit families in which one edited distance changes $\Theta(n^2)$ ultrametric entries. In addition, we prove a conditional near-additivity principle for multiple edits under certified large per-edit changed regions and negligible aggregate overlap. Experiments on deep-embedding graphs show that the resulting structural scores provide useful vulnerability diagnostics for hierarchical representations.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.04014 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.04014v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04014
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Alokendu Mazumder [view email] [v1] Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:16:34 UTC (5,543 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled On Hamming-Lipschitz Type Stability of the Subdominant (Minmax) Ultrametric: Theory and Simple Proofs, by Alokendu Mazumder and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)