On Cross-Validation for Hyperparameter Optimization of Deep Learning Image Classifiers
arXiv:2608.14705v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) can materially affect the performance of deep learning (DL) image classifiers, but there is little empirical guidance on how to derive the validation signal that drives it, especially for the small sample sizes common in fields such as medical imaging. We compared three HPO protocols in terms of {\em absolute performance-estimation error} (AEE; the absolute difference between the winning configuration's validation AUROC and its test AUROC): fixed holdout (F), reshuffled holdout (R), and 5-fold cross-validation (C). The search space, sampler, training procedure, architecture, and test set were held identical across protocols. We evaluated the protocols on three public datasets spanning two regimes: binary medical imaging (RSNA pneumonia radiographs and binarized HAM10000 skin lesions) and 200-class natural imaging (Tiny ImageNet), across a range of development set sizes $n$ and two backbones (ResNet-18 on all datasets, Vision Transformer (ViT-S/16) on RSNA). On the medical datasets, every point estimate favored cross-validation over both holdout protocols, with reductions in AEE largest at small sample sizes and diminishing as $n$ increased. This pattern remained robust under conservative family-wise adjustment. On Tiny ImageNet, AEE was negligible under all three protocols. Test AUROC was generally similar among protocols. Fixed holdout had lower mean AEE than reshuffled holdout in 11 of 12 medical conditions, although this secondary finding was less uniformly supported. For small-sample medical image classification, we recommend cross-validation-based HPO when computational resources permit because it trades additional computation for a more reliable development-time estimate of subsequent test performance.
-->
[Submitted on 10 Aug 2026]
Title:On Cross-Validation for Hyperparameter Optimization of Deep Learning Image Classifiers
View a PDF of the paper titled On Cross-Validation for Hyperparameter Optimization of Deep Learning Image Classifiers, by Ljubomir Buturovic (East Palo Alto and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) can materially affect the performance of deep learning (DL) image classifiers, but there is little empirical guidance on how to derive the validation signal that drives it, especially for the small sample sizes common in fields such as medical imaging. We compared three HPO protocols in terms of {\em
absolute performance-estimation error} (AEE; the absolute difference between the winning configuration's validation AUROC and its test AUROC): fixed holdout (F), reshuffled holdout (R), and 5-fold cross-validation (C). The search space, sampler, training procedure, architecture, and test set were held identical across protocols. We evaluated the protocols on three public datasets spanning two regimes: binary medical imaging (RSNA pneumonia radiographs and binarized HAM10000 skin lesions) and 200-class natural imaging (Tiny ImageNet), across a range of development set sizes $n$ and two backbones (ResNet-18 on all datasets, Vision Transformer (ViT-S/16) on RSNA). On the medical datasets, every point estimate favored cross-validation over both holdout protocols, with reductions in AEE largest at small sample sizes and diminishing as $n$ increased. This pattern remained robust under conservative family-wise adjustment. On Tiny ImageNet, AEE was negligible under all three protocols. Test AUROC was generally similar among protocols. Fixed holdout had lower mean AEE than reshuffled holdout in 11 of 12 medical conditions, although this secondary finding was less uniformly supported. For small-sample medical image classification, we recommend cross-validation-based HPO when computational resources permit because it trades additional computation for a more reliable development-time estimate of subsequent test performance.
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.14705 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2608.14705v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14705
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Ljubomir Buturovic [view email] [v1] Mon, 10 Aug 2026 22:44:42 UTC (379 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled On Cross-Validation for Hyperparameter Optimization of Deep Learning Image Classifiers, by Ljubomir Buturovic (East Palo Alto and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Ancillary-file links:
Ancillary files (details):
README.md
bham/dataset_info.json
bham/split_manifest.csv
bham_cv.sh
bham_rf.sh
build_bham.py
crossed_inference.py
cvdl.py
cvdl_parser.py
dl_tin.py
family.py
familywise_aee/checkpoints.csv
familywise_aee/familywise_aee_inference.csv
familywise_aee/summary.md
main_logs.sh
make_rsnap_splits.py
results.csv
results/bham1000cv.csv
results/bham1000cv_best.csv
results/bham1000rf.csv
results/bham1000rf_best.csv
results/bham100cv.csv
results/bham100cv_best.csv
results/bham100rf.csv
results/bham100rf_best.csv
results/bham3000cv.csv
results/bham3000cv_best.csv
results/bham3000rf.csv
results/bham3000rf_best.csv
results/bham300cv.csv
results/bham300cv_best.csv
results/bham300rf.csv
results/bham300rf_best.csv
results/r1000cv.csv
results/r1000cv_best.csv
results/r1000rf.csv
results/r1000rf_best.csv
results/r100cv.csv
results/r100cv_best.csv
results/r100rf.csv
results/r100rf_best.csv
results/r3000cv.csv
results/r3000cv_best.csv
results/r3000rf.csv
results/r3000rf_best.csv
results/r300cv.csv
results/r300cv_best.csv
results/r300rf.csv
results/r300rf_best.csv
results/rvit1000cv.csv
results/rvit1000cv_best.csv
results/rvit1000rf.csv
results/rvit1000rf_best.csv
results/rvit100cv.csv
results/rvit100cv_best.csv
results/rvit100rf.csv
results/rvit100rf_best.csv
results/rvit3000cv.csv
results/rvit3000cv_best.csv
results/rvit3000rf.csv
results/rvit3000rf_best.csv
results/rvit300cv.csv
results/rvit300cv_best.csv
results/rvit300rf.csv
results/rvit300rf_best.csv
results/tin10000cv.csv
results/tin10000cv_best.csv
results/tin10000rf.csv
results/tin10000rf_best.csv
results/tin2000cv.csv
results/tin2000cv_best.csv
results/tin2000rf.csv
results/tin2000rf_best.csv
results/tin5000cv.csv
results/tin5000cv_best.csv
results/tin5000rf.csv
results/tin5000rf_best.csv
results_abs.pdf
results_best.csv
results_full_inference.csv
rsnap_cv.sh
rsnap_image.py
sus.py
symmetric_rsnap_rf.sh
symmetric_tin_rf.sh
tin_cv.sh
tin_sus.py
tin_test.py
tin_top1.csv
wds.py
(85 additional files not shown)
Current browse context:
cs.CV
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)