AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Oh Deer, How Should I Handle This? Seasonal Priors for Selective Wildlife Annotation and Classification

arXiv:2608.02762v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fine-grained wildlife classification in aerial imagery is limited not only by model performance, but also by unreliable labels: animals occupy few pixels, key visual cues vary seasonally, and modality-specific evidence can be ambiguous. We study adult-male identification in red deer, where the antler cycle defines predictable windows of reliable evidence for both annotation and prediction. Using 7,295 RGB-only, thermal-only, and matched RGB+thermal crop sets labeled by three annotators, we show that seasonal structure links (I) annotation quality, (II) downstream classification, and (III) selective prediction. Matched RGB+thermal review resolves more samples than either single modality, recovering majority-male labels otherwise missed by RGB or thermal alone, in human based as well as model based classification. Months with high annotator abstention also show lower classifier confidence, and soft seasonal priors mainly benefit the season-limited thermal view. Uncertainty-band abstention further improves covered accuracy up to 98.9%, though at reduced coverage and with deferral that falls disproportionately on males. Overall, a biologically grounded seasonal calendar predicts where annotation and prediction are unreliable, and can guide both annotation protocol design and modality weighting.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Hugo Markoff, Christoph Praschl, Anton Hjalte J{\o}rgensen, Christian Emil Mogensen, Mathias Bech Skadhauge, Sara Beery, Michael {\O}rsted, David C. Schedl

-->

[Submitted on 3 Aug 2026]

Title:Oh Deer, How Should I Handle This? Seasonal Priors for Selective Wildlife Annotation and Classification

View a PDF of the paper titled Oh Deer, How Should I Handle This? Seasonal Priors for Selective Wildlife Annotation and Classification, by Hugo Markoff and 7 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Fine-grained wildlife classification in aerial imagery is limited not only by model performance, but also by unreliable labels: animals occupy few pixels, key visual cues vary seasonally, and modality-specific evidence can be ambiguous. We study adult-male identification in red deer, where the antler cycle defines predictable windows of reliable evidence for both annotation and prediction. Using 7,295 RGB-only, thermal-only, and matched RGB+thermal crop sets labeled by three annotators, we show that seasonal structure links (I) annotation quality, (II) downstream classification, and (III) selective prediction. Matched RGB+thermal review resolves more samples than either single modality, recovering majority-male labels otherwise missed by RGB or thermal alone, in human based as well as model based classification. Months with high annotator abstention also show lower classifier confidence, and soft seasonal priors mainly benefit the season-limited thermal view. Uncertainty-band abstention further improves covered accuracy up to 98.9%, though at reduced coverage and with deferral that falls disproportionately on males. Overall, a biologically grounded seasonal calendar predicts where annotation and prediction are unreliable, and can guide both annotation protocol design and modality weighting.

Comments: 17 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables. Accepted to the archival (proceedings) track of the CV4Ecology workshop at ECCV 2026

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

ACM classes: I.4.8; I.5.4; J.3

Cite as: arXiv:2608.02762 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2608.02762v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02762

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hugo Markoff [view email] [v1] Mon, 3 Aug 2026 18:05:47 UTC (646 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Oh Deer, How Should I Handle This? Seasonal Priors for Selective Wildlife Annotation and Classification, by Hugo Markoff and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)