Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Offline Policy Evaluation as a decision support tool for designing Adaptive Experiments

Summary

arXiv:2609.30273v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate how historical data from fixed randomized experiments (A/B tests) can be used to inform the deployment of adaptive experiments based on contextual bandits. Given data collected under a static allocation, our goal is to assess which adaptive policies, if any, would have outperformed the original design and under what conditions. To this end, we combine off-policy evaluation (OPE) with a controlled warm-start simulation. From logged A/B test data exhibiting heterogeneous treatment effects, we estimate nuisance components and use doubly robust estimators to rank a portfolio of pre-specified adaptive and non-adaptive policies. When ground truth is available, we then deploy the same offline-trained policies in a simulator that reus…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Jo\~ao Victor Ferreira Alves, Eduardo Rocha Laurentino, Gustavo de Oliveira Kanno, Thiago Costa Rizuti da Rocha
Offline Policy Evaluation as a decision support tool for designing Adaptive Experiments
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 10 Aug 2026]

Title:Offline Policy Evaluation as a decision support tool for designing Adaptive Experiments

View a PDF of the paper titled Offline Policy Evaluation as a decision support tool for designing Adaptive Experiments, by Jo\~ao Victor Ferreira Alves and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We investigate how historical data from fixed randomized experiments (A/B tests) can be used to inform the deployment of adaptive experiments based on contextual bandits. Given data collected under a static allocation, our goal is to assess which adaptive policies, if any, would have outperformed the original design and under what conditions. To this end, we combine off-policy evaluation (OPE) with a controlled warm-start simulation. From logged A/B test data exhibiting heterogeneous treatment effects, we estimate nuisance components and use doubly robust estimators to rank a portfolio of pre-specified adaptive and non-adaptive policies. When ground truth is available, we then deploy the same offline-trained policies in a simulator that reuses the exact data-generating reward probabilities, providing a safe, ground-truth-anchored environment to study the offline-to-online transition under warm starting. Using synthetic randomized controlled trials with known heterogeneity structures and an oracle policy, our results indicate that adaptive, context-aware policies improve upon fixed allocations when meaningful heterogeneity is present, while providing little benefit in its absence. We reinforce our findings on standard open benchmarks (Hillstrom, Criteo Uplift, and LaLonde), reinterpreted through a policy-value and regret perspective. Overall, our results provide a practical methodology for deciding when adaptive experimentation is worth deploying and how to select among competing adaptive policies using existing A/B test data.

Comments: 21 pages, 7 figures, BRACIS 2026

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.30273 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.30273v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30273

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: João Victor Ferreira Alves Ferreira Alves [view email] [v1] Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:13:14 UTC (4,154 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Offline Policy Evaluation as a decision support tool for designing Adaptive Experiments, by Jo\~ao Victor Ferreira Alves and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.30273v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate how historical data from fixed randomized experiments (A/B tests) can be used to inform the deployment of adaptive e…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.