NumLeak: Public Numeric Benchmarks as Latent Labels in Foundation Models
NumLeak is a measurement framework to detect memorization of public numeric benchmarks in foundation models. Top LLMs recall exact values with high Pearson r (0.97-0.99) on financial and economic data, but performance collapses on recent holdouts. White-box logprob ranking detects memorization better than open-ended generation, and a simple system prompt defense blocks 99.8% of suffix attacks.
[2605.30393] NumLeak: Public Numeric Benchmarks as Latent Labels in Foundation Models
[Submitted on 28 May 2026]
Title:NumLeak: Public Numeric Benchmarks as Latent Labels in Foundation Models
View a PDF of the paper titled NumLeak: Public Numeric Benchmarks as Latent Labels in Foundation Models, by Anany Kotawala
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Public numeric benchmarks appear in pretraining, so an evaluation that conditions on a date may be measuring memorized recall rather than out-of-sample skill. We introduce NumLeak, a measurement framework that combines API-boundary probes on production models with a white-box controlled validation on an open causal LM. Top-tier frontier LLMs recall the Fama-French market excess return at 3-seed pooled Pearson r=0.97-0.99 while staying within 0.15 within-25bps on the five sibling factors; comparable fidelity appears on U.S. unemployment, CPI inflation, and NOAA temperature. On a recent-release holdout, parse rate collapses to 21-57% but r stays at approximately 0.99 on months answered, the refuse-or-recall asymmetry a memorized channel predicts. The white-box experiment reproduces the dose-response, and logprob ranking detects memorization that open-ended generation misses, implying closed-API black-box probes understate the channel. A Sonnet "date to market-sentiment" regression that correlates with true Mkt-RF at r=0.74 collapses to r=0.02 once the model's own recall is residualized out. A one-line system-prompt defense blocks 99.8% of a non-adaptive single-turn suffix attack set at near-zero utility cost on conceptual and historical-narrative queries
Comments: 23 pages, 12 figures, 17 tables. Accepted at the ICML 2026 Workshop on the Impact of Memorization on Trustworthy Foundation Models (MemFM)
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.30393 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.30393v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.30393
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Anany Kotawala [view email] [v1] Thu, 28 May 2026 12:52:49 UTC (255 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled NumLeak: Public Numeric Benchmarks as Latent Labels in Foundation Models, by Anany Kotawala
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs cs.AI cs.CR
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)