Not All LLM Reasoning is Visible in the Chain-of-Thought

-->

[Submitted on 24 Jul 2026]

Title:Not All LLM Reasoning is Visible in the Chain-of-Thought

View a PDF of the paper titled Not All LLM Reasoning is Visible in the Chain-of-Thought, by Vatsal Baherwani and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:A key question for AI safety is whether a language model expresses all of its reasoning in its output tokens. We demonstrate a concrete failure mode where frontier models exhibit invisible reasoning by leveraging semantically irrelevant filler tokens to improve performance on synthetic reasoning tasks. We evaluate 13 frontier language models across three tasks and find that many models benefit significantly from filler tokens, with accuracy improvements of up to 13 percentage points. The benefit depends on which tokens are used and differs across models. We further show that filler tokens enable Claude Opus 4.5 to satisfy a hidden modular arithmetic constraint without sacrificing accuracy on its primary task, demonstrating that invisible reasoning can serve objectives entirely invisible to CoT monitoring. Reinforcement learning gives Qwen3-235B strong preferences over filler token content, but neither RL nor supervised fine-tuning produces a filler token benefit that persists at test time. Our results indicate that frontier models already perform consequential computation with no interpretable trace in their output tokens.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.22925 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.22925v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22925

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Vatsal Baherwani [view email] [v1] Fri, 24 Jul 2026 21:32:48 UTC (369 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Not All LLM Reasoning is Visible in the Chain-of-Thought, by Vatsal Baherwani and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)