AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

MuteBench: Modality Unavailability Tolerance Evaluation for Incomplete Multimodal Fusion

MuteBench is a new benchmark for evaluating the robustness of multimodal fusion architectures under two common sensor failure modes (modality missing and within-modality missing), covering 9 datasets from 7 clinical domains, 6 fusion architectures, and 125,000 samples. Key findings: architecture family is the strongest predictor of robustness, channel-independent models tolerate modality missing well but are sensitive to within-modality missing, and curriculum modality dropout protects only up to the maximum dropout rate used in training.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Wugeng Zheng, Ziwen Kan, Tianlong Chen, Chen Chen, Song Wang

[2605.15235] MuteBench: Modality Unavailability Tolerance Evaluation for Incomplete Multimodal Fusion

[Submitted on 13 May 2026]

Title:MuteBench: Modality Unavailability Tolerance Evaluation for Incomplete Multimodal Fusion

View a PDF of the paper titled MuteBench: Modality Unavailability Tolerance Evaluation for Incomplete Multimodal Fusion, by Wugeng Zheng and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Multimodal physiological data powers clinical AI systems from intensive care units to wearable devices, but sensors routinely fail in practice. Two failure modes are common: modality missing, where an entire channel is absent, and within-modality missing, where a contiguous time segment is lost. No existing benchmark evaluates multiple fusion architectures under both failure modes at controlled severity levels across diverse clinical datasets. We present MuteBench, a benchmark covering 9 datasets from 7 clinical domains, 6 fusion architectures, and 2 missing-data modes over 125,000 samples. Through this benchmark, we find that architecture family is the strongest predictor of robustness, outweighing parameter count. Channel-independent models tolerate modality missing well but can be sensitive to within-modality missing, especially on short sequences. Curriculum modality dropout protects reliably only up to the maximum dropout rate used in training. We also find that channel count, sequence length, and modality alignment jointly determine which failure mode poses the greater threat. Finally, a PTB-XL case study suggests that diffusion-based imputation can improve downstream classification under within-modality missing, with the largest gains for models whose expert routing is most sensitive to corrupted inputs, though broader validation across datasets remains an open direction. MuteBench provides practitioners with concrete guidance for both selecting existing architectures and informing the design of future robust multimodal fusion methods.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.15235 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2605.15235v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.15235

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Wugeng Zheng [view email] [v1] Wed, 13 May 2026 19:32:11 UTC (292 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled MuteBench: Modality Unavailability Tolerance Evaluation for Incomplete Multimodal Fusion, by Wugeng Zheng and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)