Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Multilingual in Name Only? Cultural and Linguistic Weaknesses of LLMs in Urdu

Summary

arXiv:2609.10758v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multilingual large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for open-ended text generation, yet their behaviour in low-resource languages remains poorly understood. In this work, we question how correct and reliable is the generation of multilingual LLMs when used for the task of story generation. We consider Urdu language as a representative low-resource language. We generate Urdu-Stories, a corpus of 93 stories generated using three contemporary LLMs (GPT-5.1, Qwen-3-Max, DeepSeek-3.1). We manually annotate the errors present in them under a nine-label linguistic, semantic, and cultural taxonomy. Our notable findings suggest that LLMs often make basic errors of grammar and semantics. The stories lack coherence, have unnatural repetitio…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Farah Adeeba, Abdul Rafae Khan, Rajesh Bhatt, Hassan Sajjad
Multilingual in Name Only? Cultural and Linguistic Weaknesses of LLMs in Urdu
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 9 Sep 2026]

Title:Multilingual in Name Only? Cultural and Linguistic Weaknesses of LLMs in Urdu

View a PDF of the paper titled Multilingual in Name Only? Cultural and Linguistic Weaknesses of LLMs in Urdu, by Farah Adeeba and Abdul Rafae Khan and Rajesh Bhatt and Hassan Sajjad

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Multilingual large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for open-ended text generation, yet their behaviour in low-resource languages remains poorly understood. In this work, we question how correct and reliable is the generation of multilingual LLMs when used for the task of story generation. We consider Urdu language as a representative low-resource language. We generate Urdu-Stories, a corpus of 93 stories generated using three contemporary LLMs (GPT-5.1, Qwen-3-Max, DeepSeek-3.1). We manually annotate the errors present in them under a nine-label linguistic, semantic, and cultural taxonomy. Our notable findings suggest that LLMs often make basic errors of grammar and semantics. The stories lack coherence, have unnatural repetition and show pervasive cultural shallowness. We further show using few-shot prompting that the cultural and context errors largely remain unresolved. Our findings highlight the limitations of current LLMs as a reliable source of content generation and information retrieval for low-resource languages.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.10758 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.10758v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10758

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Farah Adeeba [view email] [v1] Wed, 9 Sep 2026 18:59:52 UTC (465 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Multilingual in Name Only? Cultural and Linguistic Weaknesses of LLMs in Urdu, by Farah Adeeba and Abdul Rafae Khan and Rajesh Bhatt and Hassan Sajjad

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.10758v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multilingual large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for open-ended text generation, yet their behaviour in low-resource…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.