Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Multi-Rollout On-Policy Distillation via Peer Successes and Failures

Summary

Introduces MOPD, a peer-conditioned distillation framework that uses multiple student rollouts to construct better teacher signals by considering both successes and failures. Outperforms standard on-policy baselines on several reasoning benchmarks.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Weichen Yu, Xiaomin Li, Yizhou Zhao, Xiaoze Liu, Ruowang Zhang, Haixin Wang, Yinyi Luo, Chen Henry Wu, Gaurav Mittal, Matt Fredrikson, Yu Hu
Multi-Rollout On-Policy Distillation via Peer Successes and Failures
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.12652] Multi-Rollout On-Policy Distillation via Peer Successes and Failures

[Submitted on 12 May 2026]

Title:Multi-Rollout On-Policy Distillation via Peer Successes and Failures

View a PDF of the paper titled Multi-Rollout On-Policy Distillation via Peer Successes and Failures, by Weichen Yu and 10 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language models are often post-trained with sparse verifier rewards, which indicate whether a sampled trajectory succeeds but provide limited guidance about where reasoning succeeds or fails. On-policy distillation (OPD) offers denser token-level supervision by training on student-generated trajectories, yet existing methods typically distill each rollout independently and ignore the other attempts sampled for the same prompt. We introduce Multi-Rollout On-Policy Distillation (MOPD), a peer-conditioned distillation framework that uses the student's local rollout group to construct more informative teacher signals. MOPD conditions the teacher on both successful and failed peer rollouts: successes provide positive evidence for valid reasoning patterns, while failures provide structured negative evidence about plausible mistakes to avoid. We study two peer-context constructions: positive peer imitation and contrastive success-failure conditioning. Experiments on competitive programming, mathematical reasoning, scientific question answering, and tool-use benchmarks show that MOPD consistently improves over standard on-policy baselines. Further teacher-signal analysis shows that mixed success-failure contexts better align teacher scores with verifier rewards, indicating that the gains arise from more faithful, instance-adaptive supervision. These results indicate that effective on-policy distillation should exploit the student's multi-rollout trial-and-error behavior rather than treating rollouts as isolated samples.

Comments: 23 pages

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.12652 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2605.12652v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.12652

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Weichen Yu [view email] [v1] Tue, 12 May 2026 18:57:44 UTC (454 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Multi-Rollout On-Policy Distillation via Peer Successes and Failures, by Weichen Yu and 10 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • MOPD leverages multiple rollouts (successes and failures) per prompt to improve distillation.
  • Two peer-context constructions: positive imitation and contrastive conditioning.
  • Outperforms standard OPD on programming, math, science QA, and tool use.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

Multi-Rollout On-Policy Distillation via Peer Successes and Failures | AI News Hub