Meta-ethics and AI: exploring the novel meta-ethical questions in the era of AI
Looking beyond human-imposed AI ethics, this paper asks what real AI moral agency would mean for meta-ethics. It offers a conditional framework distinguishing four domains of inquiry across human and AI perspectives, then argues mainstream human-centered theories will require significant revision before they can address AI moral systems.
-->
[Submitted on 1 Sep 2026]
Title:Meta-ethics and AI: exploring the novel meta-ethical questions in the era of AI
View a PDF of the paper titled Meta-ethics and AI: exploring the novel meta-ethical questions in the era of AI, by Shang Lu
View PDF
Abstract:With the development of artificial intelligence (AI), the landscape of meta-ethics, which has largely centred on human ethics, faces pressures that may significantly reconfigure it. In particular, if future AI systems were to exhibit sufficiently integrated capacities for moral reasoning, moral intentionality, and moral reflection, novel meta-ethical questions would arise concerning what I call "AI's own ethics", as distinct from ethical principles merely imposed on AI by human designers. This paper offers a conditional and methodological framework for identifying the questions that would emerge if such AI systems were to arise. On that basis, the paper distinguishes four domains of meta-ethical inquiry in the era of AI: questions about the nature of human ethics from the human perspective; questions about the nature of AI's own ethics from the human perspective; questions about the nature of human ethics from the AI perspective; and questions about the nature of AI's own ethics from the AI perspective. The paper then considers how some existing mainstream meta-ethical theories (such as cognitivism and non-cognitivism, error theory and success theory, relativism, and objective realism) might illuminate these domains, while arguing that many familiar human-centred formulations of those theories may not transfer straightforwardly to AI cases without substantial revision. The overall conclusion is that the emergence of AI's own ethics would place significant pressure on current frameworks and may require substantial refinement, reconstruction, or reconceptualisation.
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.01685 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.01685v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01685
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: AI and Ethics (2026), 6, Article 281
Related DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01134-y
DOI(s) linking to related resources
Submission history
From: Shang Lu [view email] [v1] Tue, 1 Sep 2026 14:56:09 UTC (1,317 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Meta-ethics and AI: exploring the novel meta-ethical questions in the era of AI, by Shang Lu
View PDF
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
new | recent | 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs cs.CY
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)