Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Memorize, Adapt, Ignore: Diagnosing Robot Learning Mechanisms under Training Data Variation

Summary

arXiv:2609.38401v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training data variation, whether through designing a domain randomization (DR) scheme in simulation or curating demonstrations for imitation learning, is a primary lever for improving the robustness of robotic manipulation policies. Yet its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, and practitioners typically select randomization parameters through expensive trial and error. We investigate these mechanisms through a series of case studies, randomizing object size, color, and type as well as scene lighting and linguistic prompts across settings including pick-and-place RL in ManiSkill and fine-tuning of vision-language-action (VLA) models on LIBERO and RoboTwin. We examine both model behavior and internal representations, using the empi…

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Ke Zhang, Danica J. Sutherland, Chao Liu
Memorize, Adapt, Ignore: Diagnosing Robot Learning Mechanisms under Training Data Variation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 29 Sep 2026]

Title:Memorize, Adapt, Ignore: Diagnosing Robot Learning Mechanisms under Training Data Variation

View a PDF of the paper titled Memorize, Adapt, Ignore: Diagnosing Robot Learning Mechanisms under Training Data Variation, by Ke Zhang and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Training data variation, whether through designing a domain randomization (DR) scheme in simulation or curating demonstrations for imitation learning, is a primary lever for improving the robustness of robotic manipulation policies. Yet its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, and practitioners typically select randomization parameters through expensive trial and error. We investigate these mechanisms through a series of case studies, randomizing object size, color, and type as well as scene lighting and linguistic prompts across settings including pick-and-place RL in ManiSkill and fine-tuning of vision-language-action (VLA) models on LIBERO and RoboTwin. We examine both model behavior and internal representations, using the empirical neural tangent kernel (NTK) as our primary diagnostic tool. We show that the NTK distinguishes a shift in the internal learning mechanism from \textit{memorizing} different situations with insufficient variation (e.g.\ learning what to do for a large cube, and what to do for a small cube) to \textit{adapting} to the situation at hand with sufficient variation. An NTK-based signal-to-noise ratio also helps distinguish when policies have learned to \emph{ignore} task-irrelevant factors (e.g.\ treating blue and red cubes identically, instead of learning a blue sub-policy and a red sub-policy). We use these diagnostics to develop practical guidance for designing DR schemes, selecting models, and detecting shortcut learning. We further compare different kinds of representations and validate our findings with real-world hardware experiments using ACT-based imitation learning.

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.38401 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.38401v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38401

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ke Zhang [view email] [v1] Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:57:43 UTC (3,461 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Memorize, Adapt, Ignore: Diagnosing Robot Learning Mechanisms under Training Data Variation, by Ke Zhang and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.38401v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training data variation, whether through designing a domain randomization (DR) scheme in simulation or curating demonstrations for…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.