Measuring the Dependency Gap: Diagnosing Inter-Column Fidelity in Tabular Generative Models
Synthetic tabular data is valued for preserving inter-column dependencies, but common metrics are largely blind to them. This paper introduces a dependency-aware fidelity diagnostic that decomposes a strong classifier two-sample test into marginal, dependency, and cross components. Applied to a state-of-the-art flow-matching generator, it reveals a real dependency gap missed by standard metrics, with implications for minority-class utility. The gap is shown to be stubborn, not ameliorated by capacity increase or common interventions.
-->
[Submitted on 20 Jul 2026]
Title:Measuring the Dependency Gap: Diagnosing Inter-Column Fidelity in Tabular Generative Models
View a PDF of the paper titled Measuring the Dependency Gap: Diagnosing Inter-Column Fidelity in Tabular Generative Models, by Jie Zhang
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Synthetic tabular data is valued for preserving not only each column's marginal distribution but the dependencies between columns -- structure that carries much of the discriminative signal for minority classes in imbalanced domains such as fraud and clinical risk. Yet the metrics most commonly used to certify synthetic tabular data are, we show, largely blind to inter-column dependency: a baseline that models every column independently (and therefore destroys all dependency) is judged indistinguishable from real data by the logistic-regression C2ST, and the pairwise Trend score is only partially sensitive. We introduce a dependency-aware fidelity diagnostic that decomposes a strong classifier two-sample test (XGB-C2ST) into marginal, dependency, and numerical-categorical cross components, anchored between a worst-case fully-factorized reference (all dependency destroyed) and a best-case real-data oracle. Applying it to a state-of-the-art flow-matching generator (TabbyFlow/EF-VFM), we find a real dependency gap that standard metrics miss; destroying dependency outright collapses minority-class utility, and the generator's residual gap carries a smaller, consistent utility cost. We then ask whether this gap reflects a structural limitation of mean-field generative objectives. It does not: consistent with recent recovery results for variational flow matching, the objective is asymptotically exact. Yet the gap is stubborn -- a 16x increase in model capacity does not close it -- pointing to the absence of direct dependency supervision rather than a capacity or structural limit. Consistent with this, and because the residual gap is higher-order, no cheap intervention closes it: not an in-model dependency mechanism, not post-hoc copula correction, and not the 16x capacity increase -- a caution for a field that assumes such fixes help.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.21636 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.21636v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21636
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Jie Zhang [view email] [v1] Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:56:32 UTC (45 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Measuring the Dependency Gap: Diagnosing Inter-Column Fidelity in Tabular Generative Models, by Jie Zhang
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
new | recent | 2026-07
Change to browse by:
cs cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)