AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Lost in Reconstruction: Aligning Action Representations with Language in Vision-Language-Action Models

arXiv:2608.10484v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Action verbs describe not only the physical outcomes of actions, but also how those actions are performed. Yet action representations in vision-language-action models (VLAs) are typically optimized for reconstruction under L1/L2 losses in raw action space, where numerical proximity need not reflect linguistically meaningful distinctions. On BridgeV2, we show that action trajectories contain verb-grounding information beyond visual state changes, and that reconstruction-only discrete tokenization systematically erodes this information. To address this problem, we introduce SALT, a Semantically ALigned action Tokenizer that augments a VQ-VAE-style tokenizer with an auxiliary objective requiring a frozen vision-language model to recover the episode instruction from quantized action latents. Policies trained with SALT achieve 71.9% average success in SimplerEnv, compared with 42.7% for a reconstruction-only VQ-VAE tokenizer and 31.2% for FAST. SALT also develops verb-specialized codes while maintaining reconstruction fidelity. These results show that robot action trajectories provide a source of language grounding and that preserving this structure in action representations can substantially improve language-conditioned control.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Li Wenjie, Yash Jangir, Ignacy Stepka, Yash Agarwal, Marion Kipsang, Yonatan Bisk

-->

[Submitted on 11 Aug 2026]

Title:Lost in Reconstruction: Aligning Action Representations with Language in Vision-Language-Action Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Lost in Reconstruction: Aligning Action Representations with Language in Vision-Language-Action Models, by Li Wenjie and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Action verbs describe not only the physical outcomes of actions, but also how those actions are performed. Yet action representations in vision-language-action models (VLAs) are typically optimized for reconstruction under L1/L2 losses in raw action space, where numerical proximity need not reflect linguistically meaningful distinctions. On BridgeV2, we show that action trajectories contain verb-grounding information beyond visual state changes, and that reconstruction-only discrete tokenization systematically erodes this information. To address this problem, we introduce SALT, a Semantically ALigned action Tokenizer that augments a VQ-VAE-style tokenizer with an auxiliary objective requiring a frozen vision-language model to recover the episode instruction from quantized action latents. Policies trained with SALT achieve 71.9% average success in SimplerEnv, compared with 42.7% for a reconstruction-only VQ-VAE tokenizer and 31.2% for FAST. SALT also develops verb-specialized codes while maintaining reconstruction fidelity. These results show that robot action trajectories provide a source of language grounding and that preserving this structure in action representations can substantially improve language-conditioned control.

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2608.10484 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2608.10484v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10484

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Li Wenjie [view email] [v1] Tue, 11 Aug 2026 04:57:17 UTC (5,504 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Lost in Reconstruction: Aligning Action Representations with Language in Vision-Language-Action Models, by Li Wenjie and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.CL

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)