Local Gains and Fixed-Assignment Set Losses in Shared Set Decoders
arXiv:2608.14717v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A query-relation deletion can improve the edited slot while reducing the utility of the prediction set that contains it. We study this tension in two related ResNet-50 DETR-family checkpoints using recorded, selection-conditional evidence from 710 paired image-relation units per checkpoint. The primary comparison subtracts a matched active control, which deletes the same leader source at a different recorded recipient, from the selected target deletion. It is therefore a composite contrast rather than a same-recipient placebo. The target-minus-control contrast is locally positive and fixed-assignment negative in both checkpoints. The opposite-sign pattern occurs within 302/710 DETR units and 460/710 DINO units. After rematching, the corresponding counts are 285/710 and 433/710. Rematching and native selection absorb enough of the mean loss for DETR intervals to cross zero, whereas DINO intervals remain negative, so persistence across readouts differs by checkpoint. A fixed-map comparison between hard deletion and a mass-preserving edit also differs before rematching. That comparison is conditional on the outcome-blind map and does not establish same-dose transport. Local intervention success therefore does not determine the consequence for a jointly decoded set. The supported conclusion is selection-conditional deletion sensitivity whose persistence depends on the readout and intervention operator. We do not identify an intervention-invariant edge mechanism, detector-level degradation, population prevalence, or the value of a training-time regularizer.
-->
[Submitted on 12 Aug 2026]
Title:Local Gains and Fixed-Assignment Set Losses in Shared Set Decoders
View a PDF of the paper titled Local Gains and Fixed-Assignment Set Losses in Shared Set Decoders, by Ze Zhang and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:A query-relation deletion can improve the edited slot while reducing the utility of the prediction set that contains it. We study this tension in two related ResNet-50 DETR-family checkpoints using recorded, selection-conditional evidence from 710 paired image-relation units per checkpoint. The primary comparison subtracts a matched active control, which deletes the same leader source at a different recorded recipient, from the selected target deletion. It is therefore a composite contrast rather than a same-recipient placebo.
The target-minus-control contrast is locally positive and fixed-assignment negative in both checkpoints. The opposite-sign pattern occurs within 302/710 DETR units and 460/710 DINO units. After rematching, the corresponding counts are 285/710 and 433/710. Rematching and native selection absorb enough of the mean loss for DETR intervals to cross zero, whereas DINO intervals remain negative, so persistence across readouts differs by checkpoint. A fixed-map comparison between hard deletion and a mass-preserving edit also differs before rematching. That comparison is conditional on the outcome-blind map and does not establish same-dose transport.
Local intervention success therefore does not determine the consequence for a jointly decoded set. The supported conclusion is selection-conditional deletion sensitivity whose persistence depends on the readout and intervention operator. We do not identify an intervention-invariant edge mechanism, detector-level degradation, population prevalence, or the value of a training-time regularizer.
Comments: 13 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables. An ancillary analysis-ready package supports exact aggregate reproduction without model inference. Code and reproduction package: this https URL
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.14717 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2608.14717v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14717
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Ze Zhang [view email] [v1] Wed, 12 Aug 2026 03:14:43 UTC (1,447 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Local Gains and Fixed-Assignment Set Losses in Shared Set Decoders, by Ze Zhang and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Ancillary-file links:
Ancillary files (details):
ARTIFACT_MANIFEST.json
DATA_AND_MODEL_PROVENANCE.md
README.md
analysis_ready/ANALYSIS_READY_PROVENANCE.json
analysis_ready/gate_c_detr_r50_500.jsonl
analysis_ready/gate_c_dino_r50_4s_12e.jsonl
analysis_ready/h4_d_detr_r50_500.jsonl
analysis_ready/h4_d_dino_r50_4s_12e.jsonl
analysis_ready/t1_detr_r50_500.jsonl
analysis_ready/t1_dino_r50_4s_12e.jsonl
analysis_ready/t2_detr_r50_500.jsonl
analysis_ready/t2_dino_r50_4s_12e.jsonl
audit/H4_D_FULL_INTEGRITY_AUDIT.json
audit/H4_GATE_C_D_FULL_INTEGRITY_AUDIT_V2.json
audit/N1_REPLAY_INTEGRITY_AUDIT.json
audit/T0B_D_LOCAL_FULL_INTEGRITY.json
audit/T0B_REALIZED_DOSE_OVERLAP.json
audit/T0B_R_PILOT_LOCAL_INTEGRITY.json
audit/T0B_R_PILOT_MANIFEST.json
audit/T1_REALIZED_DOSE_MAPPING.json
audit/T2_CONFIRMATION_PAIR_MANIFEST.json
audit/T2_CONFIRMATION_POPULATION_MANIFEST.json
audit/T2_CONFIRMATION_V2_FULL_INTEGRITY.json
audit/T2_INPUT_CAPTURE_INTEGRITY.json
audit/T2_OUTCOME_BLIND_MAPPING.json
audit/T2_REALIZED_DOSE_OVERLAP.json
code/iclr_h4_aggregate.py
code/iclr_h4_gate_c_aggregate.py
code/iclr_n1_aggregate.py
code/iclr_transport_t0.py
code/iclr_transport_t0b_integrity.py
code/iclr_transport_t0b_overlap.py
code/iclr_transport_t1_aggregate.py
code/iclr_transport_t2_aggregate.py
code/iclr_transport_t2_confirmation_integrity.py
code/iclr_transport_t2_input_overlap.py
code/p1_artifact_manifest.py
code/p1_export_analysis_ready.py
code/p1_reproduce_from_analysis_ready.py
code/reference_src/future_qc/iclr_h4/estimands.py
code/reference_src/future_qc/iclr_n1/statistics.py
configs/fq_iclr_h4_gate_c_aggregation_v1.json
configs/fq_iclr_h4_gate_c_d_v2.json
configs/fq_iclr_h4_set_externality_v1.json
configs/fq_iclr_n1_aggregation_v1.json
configs/fq_iclr_n1_instrumented_replay_v1.json
configs/fq_iclr_transport_t0_v1.json
configs/fq_iclr_transport_t0b_v1.json
configs/fq_iclr_transport_t1_aggregation_v1.json
configs/fq_iclr_transport_t2_confirmation_execution_v2.json
configs/fq_iclr_transport_t2_confirmation_v1.json
configs/fq_iclr_transport_t2_input_overlap_v1.json
expected/H4_D_SCIENTIFIC_AGGREGATE.json
expected/H4_GATE_C_SCIENTIFIC_AGGREGATE.json
expected/N1_MECHANISM_AGGREGATE.json
expected/T0_COMMON_ESTIMAND_AUDIT.json
expected/T1_PRE_READOUT_LOCALIZATION.json
expected/T2_CONFIRMATION_INITIAL_128_AGGREGATE.json
reproduced/GATE_C_REPRODUCED.json
reproduced/H4_D_REPRODUCED.json
reproduced/REPRODUCTION_VALIDATION.json
reproduced/T1_REPRODUCED.json
reproduced/T2_REPRODUCED.json
(58 additional files not shown)
Current browse context:
cs.CV
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)