Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Literal Lock-In: How Test Language Shifts Literal Attraction in Typed Decision Models on Bengali Idioms

Summary

arXiv:2610.22526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decision models, non-generative scorers that report a probability over caller-supplied options and emit no text, are increasingly deployed as routers, classifiers and guardrails. Because they generate nothing, rationales and chain-of-thought do not apply. We audit three: an encoder scorer, a decoder scorer and a closed API, entirely through interventions on their input, using expert-annotated Bengali idioms carrying a gold figurative and a gold literal gloss. Dropping an idiom's own literal gloss into the option list draws every arm toward it, taking 65% to 96% of each arm's remaining Bengali errors. A model-by-language matrix over one shared item set shows how far this depends on the test language: every arm is 1.9 to 6.4 times more capture…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Adib Sakhawat, Syed Rifat Raiyan
Literal Lock-In: How Test Language Shifts Literal Attraction in Typed Decision Models on Bengali Idioms
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 15 Oct 2026]

Title:Literal Lock-In: How Test Language Shifts Literal Attraction in Typed Decision Models on Bengali Idioms

View a PDF of the paper titled Literal Lock-In: How Test Language Shifts Literal Attraction in Typed Decision Models on Bengali Idioms, by Adib Sakhawat and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Decision models, non-generative scorers that report a probability over caller-supplied options and emit no text, are increasingly deployed as routers, classifiers and guardrails. Because they generate nothing, rationales and chain-of-thought do not apply. We audit three: an encoder scorer, a decoder scorer and a closed API, entirely through interventions on their input, using expert-annotated Bengali idioms carrying a gold figurative and a gold literal gloss. Dropping an idiom's own literal gloss into the option list draws every arm toward it, taking 65% to 96% of each arm's remaining Bengali errors. A model-by-language matrix over one shared item set shows how far this depends on the test language: every arm is 1.9 to 6.4 times more captured in Bengali than in English on the same paired entries, the commercial model's apparent resistance is a property of its test language, and capability does not order the failure. Calibration degrades in all three arms, and on the open arms confidence inverts, so gating on it is worse than gating at random. On a semantics-free option list, where accuracy is at chance, the best-calibrated arm still reports mean confidence 0.82. Code and data: this https URL.

Comments: Under review, 33 pages, 12 figures, 22 tables

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.22526 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.22526v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22526

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Syed Rifat Raiyan [view email] [v1] Thu, 15 Oct 2026 18:19:02 UTC (1,631 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Literal Lock-In: How Test Language Shifts Literal Attraction in Typed Decision Models on Bengali Idioms, by Adib Sakhawat and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.22526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decision models, non-generative scorers that report a probability over caller-supplied options and emit no text, are increasingly d…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.