AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Limitations of Synthetic Data Generation in Specialized Data-Scarce Domains

arXiv:2608.13729v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Advances in diffusion-based generative models have motivated the use of synthetic image generation to alleviate data scarcity in vision tasks. While this strategy has shown promise in natural image benchmarks such as ImageNet, its effectiveness in sparse, high-variance real-world domains remains unclear. In this work, we focus on domains where images differ substantially from common image datasets and additional data are expensive to obtain. Against non-generative data augmentation baselines, we evaluate the downstream classifier performance improvements yielded by two schools of generative sparse data extension: distribution modeling and sample perturbation. Across five trauma classification tasks using subject-wise train--validation splits, no generative approach consistently outperforms a strong non-generative baseline. Feature-space analysis reveals recurring failure modes: memorization or collapse, distributional drift, and generation of visually plausible but simplified canonical instances that are easier to classify than real data.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Edward Zhang, Marcel Hussing, Tanay Tandon, Shenbagaraj Kannapiran, Jason Hughes, Youkang Wang, Joshua Caswell, Agelos Kratimenos, Yi Fan Li, Milan Manoj, Ethan Sanchez, Sumukh Shrote, Camillo Jose Taylor, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Eric Eaton

-->

[Submitted on 13 Aug 2026]

Title:Limitations of Synthetic Data Generation in Specialized Data-Scarce Domains

View a PDF of the paper titled Limitations of Synthetic Data Generation in Specialized Data-Scarce Domains, by Edward Zhang and 14 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Advances in diffusion-based generative models have motivated the use of synthetic image generation to alleviate data scarcity in vision tasks. While this strategy has shown promise in natural image benchmarks such as ImageNet, its effectiveness in sparse, high-variance real-world domains remains unclear. In this work, we focus on domains where images differ substantially from common image datasets and additional data are expensive to obtain. Against non-generative data augmentation baselines, we evaluate the downstream classifier performance improvements yielded by two schools of generative sparse data extension: distribution modeling and sample perturbation. Across five trauma classification tasks using subject-wise train--validation splits, no generative approach consistently outperforms a strong non-generative baseline. Feature-space analysis reveals recurring failure modes: memorization or collapse, distributional drift, and generation of visually plausible but simplified canonical instances that are easier to classify than real data.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2608.13729 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2608.13729v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.13729

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Edward Zhang [view email] [v1] Thu, 13 Aug 2026 19:43:31 UTC (7,193 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Limitations of Synthetic Data Generation in Specialized Data-Scarce Domains, by Edward Zhang and 14 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)