Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Lensless Gaze Is Not Private by Default: Auditing Identity Leakage Across Disclosure Surfaces

Summary

arXiv:2609.09188v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Lensless near-eye sensing is often described as privacy-friendly because its coded measurements are visually unintelligible. Yet visual unintelligibility reflects human interpretation, not what a learned adversary can recover. We therefore treat identity privacy as a systems property of disclosure surfaces: representations crossing sensing, storage, computation, and output boundaries. We audit a simulated lensless gaze pipeline under a 36-subject known-gallery closed-set identification protocol with a fixed, known PSF; privacy from an unknown or varying optical key is outside our scope. Reported accuracies are empirical attack success rates under matched linear and MLP probes and do not upper-bound stronger adversaries. Simulated lensless me…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Rahul Vimalkanth, Kaushik Mitra
Lensless Gaze Is Not Private by Default: Auditing Identity Leakage Across Disclosure Surfaces
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 31 Aug 2026]

Title:Lensless Gaze Is Not Private by Default: Auditing Identity Leakage Across Disclosure Surfaces

View a PDF of the paper titled Lensless Gaze Is Not Private by Default: Auditing Identity Leakage Across Disclosure Surfaces, by Rahul Vimalkanth and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Lensless near-eye sensing is often described as privacy-friendly because its coded measurements are visually unintelligible. Yet visual unintelligibility reflects human interpretation, not what a learned adversary can recover. We therefore treat identity privacy as a systems property of disclosure surfaces: representations crossing sensing, storage, computation, and output boundaries. We audit a simulated lensless gaze pipeline under a 36-subject known-gallery closed-set identification protocol with a fixed, known PSF; privacy from an unknown or varying optical key is outside our scope. Reported accuracies are empirical attack success rates under matched linear and MLP probes and do not upper-bound stronger adversaries. Simulated lensless measurements yield 96.7% top-1 identification versus 97.7% for matched original eye crops, while an MAE embedding retains 94.3%. Compression alone offers little protection: 8-D PCA and a matched 8-D bottleneck retain 93.2% and 91.8%, whereas separately trained 8-D GSPL bottlenecks yield 77.5% mean recovery across three seeds. A released 128-way gaze token lowers single-frame recovery to 38.1%, while its residual and continuous gaze output expose 62.1% and 72.6%, respectively. Under a source-frame-disjoint tiled protocol, token summaries reach 39.9% at T=25, showing that repeated-output risk depends on representation and aggregation. These rates reflect all subject-correlated information in the evaluated dataset, including acquisition and behavioral cues, rather than isolating intrinsic ocular biometrics. Ordinary least squares residualization against a six-dimensional crop geometry and intensity summary still leaves lensless recovery at 95.1%. Our results show that privacy claims for lensless sensing must be tested at disclosure boundaries rather than inferred from appearance.

Comments: 16 pages, 5 figures. Accepted at the PFATCV Workshop, ECCV 2026. Code available at this https URL

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.09188 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.09188v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09188

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Rahul Vimalkanth [view email] [v1] Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:31:01 UTC (22,804 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Lensless Gaze Is Not Private by Default: Auditing Identity Leakage Across Disclosure Surfaces, by Rahul Vimalkanth and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.09188v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Lensless near-eye sensing is often described as privacy-friendly because its coded measurements are visually unintelligible. Yet vi…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.