Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

LEGO: Synergizing Expert GraphRAG and Expert Chain-of-Thought for Legal Reasoning

Summary

arXiv:2609.27009v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly applied to high-risk domains such as law, yet complex legal reasoning remains limited by two structural challenges. First, existing RAG and GraphRAG methods emphasize lexical or semantic similarity while overlooking normative relations among legal provisions. Second, vanilla Chain-of-Thought prompting may generate plausible rationales without enforcing the normative structure of legal reasoning. To deal with the bottleneck of pipelines in the legal reasoning domain, we propose LEGO, a dual-module framework that synergizes Legal Expert GraphRAG and expert Chain-of-thought for complex legal reasoning. ExpertGraphRAG uses an expert-annotated civil code graph encoding these normative relations with a greedy…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Qingjing Chen, Junkai Zhang, Shaochun Wang, Jiahao Ding, Siyuan Zheng, Yukun Yan, Zhi Zheng, Antonino Rotolo, Yun Liu, Weixing Shen
LEGO: Synergizing Expert GraphRAG and Expert Chain-of-Thought for Legal Reasoning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 22 Sep 2026]

Title:LEGO: Synergizing Expert GraphRAG and Expert Chain-of-Thought for Legal Reasoning

View a PDF of the paper titled LEGO: Synergizing Expert GraphRAG and Expert Chain-of-Thought for Legal Reasoning, by Qingjing Chen and Junkai Zhang and Shaochun Wang and Jiahao Ding and Siyuan Zheng and Yukun Yan and Zhi Zheng and Antonino Rotolo and Yun Liu and Weixing Shen

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language models are increasingly applied to high-risk domains such as law, yet complex legal reasoning remains limited by two structural challenges. First, existing RAG and GraphRAG methods emphasize lexical or semantic similarity while overlooking normative relations among legal provisions. Second, vanilla Chain-of-Thought prompting may generate plausible rationales without enforcing the normative structure of legal reasoning. To deal with the bottleneck of pipelines in the legal reasoning domain, we propose LEGO, a dual-module framework that synergizes Legal Expert GraphRAG and expert Chain-of-thought for complex legal reasoning. ExpertGraphRAG uses an expert-annotated civil code graph encoding these normative relations with a greedy normative-coverage retrieval algorithm to dynamically extract instance-specific provision subgraphs, while ExpertCoT organizes the retrieved provisions and case facts into structured Provision-Fact-Conclusion reasoning. With a Qwen3-8B backbone, LEGO achieves 40.53% exact-match accuracy on LawExamQA_Civil, outperforming the evaluated RAG and CoT baselines and performing comparably to the evaluated larger models, while remaining robust on multi-hop questions. It also achieves the best results among the evaluated baselines on the open-ended benchmarks. Ablation studies confirm the individual and complementary contributions of both modules, demonstrating LEGO's effectiveness in improving LLMs' complex legal reasoning ability. Code and dataset can be found in the link: this https URL

Comments: Accepted to EMNLP 2026(Findings)

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.27009 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.27009v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27009

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Qingjing Chen [view email] [v1] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 19:48:52 UTC (19,490 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled LEGO: Synergizing Expert GraphRAG and Expert Chain-of-Thought for Legal Reasoning, by Qingjing Chen and Junkai Zhang and Shaochun Wang and Jiahao Ding and Siyuan Zheng and Yukun Yan and Zhi Zheng and Antonino Rotolo and Yun Liu and Weixing Shen

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.IR

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.27009v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly applied to high-risk domains such as law, yet complex legal reasoning remains limited by two…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.