跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
来源内容 · 翻译待补全2 分钟阅读

待翻译:Learning User Representations to Improve Simulation Fidelity

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2610.22518v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: User simulators enable interactive training and evaluation of AI assistants at scale. Yet current simulators struggle to reproduce the diverse behaviors of real users, leading to assistants that generalize poorly to underrepresented users. We identify user representations as an underexplored bottleneck in user simulation. User representations are natural-language descriptions that condition simulators to reproduce a particular user's behavior. A representation's quality becomes apparent in hindsight, through the behavior it induces in a simulator. To evaluate and optimize user representations, we formulate a conversation reconstruction task: given an original conversation, we generate a representation, condition a…

来源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Shuhaib Mehri, Philippe Laban, Michel Galley, Dilek T\"ur, Jennifer Neville, Jianfeng Gao
待翻译:Learning User Representations to Improve Simulation Fidelity
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

[Submitted on 15 Oct 2026] Title:Learning User Representations to Improve Simulation Fidelity View a PDF of the paper titled Learning User Representations to Improve Simulation Fidelity, by Shuhaib Mehri and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:User simulators enable interactive training and evaluation of AI assistants at scale. Yet current simulators struggle to reproduce the diverse behaviors of real users, leading to assistants that generalize poorly to underrepresented users. We identify user representations as an underexplored bottleneck in user simulation. User representations are natural-language descriptions that condition simulators to reproduce a particular user's behavior. A representation's quality becomes apparent in hindsight, through the behavior it induces in a simulator. To evaluate and optimize user representations, we formulate a conversation reconstruction task: given an original conversation, we generate a representation, condition a simulator on it, simulate a conversation, and then measure fidelity by comparing user behavior in the original and simulated conversations. This comparison also yields hindsight feedback, which identifies where the representation falls short and how it can be improved. We introduce hindsight distillation, an online training procedure that distills feedback-conditioned improvements into the representation generator, enabling it to generate improved representations directly from the original conversation. We present UserRepGen-4B, a representation generator trained with hindsight distillation. Across 700 conversations spanning seven datasets, hindsight feedback helps improve user representations at test time, and UserRepGen-4B generates representations that enable more faithful simulation than those generated by GPT-5.5. Beyond conversation reconstruction, learned representations improve simulation fidelity for unseen tasks, better preserve the population-level diversity of real users, and better distinguish users across conversations. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2610.22518 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2610.22518v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22518 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Shuhaib Mehri [view email] [v1] Thu, 15 Oct 2026 18:13:21 UTC (596 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Learning User Representations to Improve Simulation Fidelity, by Shuhaib Mehri and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

投资人进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2610.22518v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: User simulators enable interactive training and evaluation of AI assistants at scale. Yet current simulators struggle to reproduce…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。