Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Learning User Representations to Improve Simulation Fidelity

Summary

arXiv:2610.22518v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: User simulators enable interactive training and evaluation of AI assistants at scale. Yet current simulators struggle to reproduce the diverse behaviors of real users, leading to assistants that generalize poorly to underrepresented users. We identify user representations as an underexplored bottleneck in user simulation. User representations are natural-language descriptions that condition simulators to reproduce a particular user's behavior. A representation's quality becomes apparent in hindsight, through the behavior it induces in a simulator. To evaluate and optimize user representations, we formulate a conversation reconstruction task: given an original conversation, we generate a representation, condition a simulator on it, simulate a…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Shuhaib Mehri, Philippe Laban, Michel Galley, Dilek T\"ur, Jennifer Neville, Jianfeng Gao
Learning User Representations to Improve Simulation Fidelity
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 15 Oct 2026]

Title:Learning User Representations to Improve Simulation Fidelity

View a PDF of the paper titled Learning User Representations to Improve Simulation Fidelity, by Shuhaib Mehri and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:User simulators enable interactive training and evaluation of AI assistants at scale. Yet current simulators struggle to reproduce the diverse behaviors of real users, leading to assistants that generalize poorly to underrepresented users. We identify user representations as an underexplored bottleneck in user simulation. User representations are natural-language descriptions that condition simulators to reproduce a particular user's behavior. A representation's quality becomes apparent in hindsight, through the behavior it induces in a simulator. To evaluate and optimize user representations, we formulate a conversation reconstruction task: given an original conversation, we generate a representation, condition a simulator on it, simulate a conversation, and then measure fidelity by comparing user behavior in the original and simulated conversations. This comparison also yields hindsight feedback, which identifies where the representation falls short and how it can be improved. We introduce hindsight distillation, an online training procedure that distills feedback-conditioned improvements into the representation generator, enabling it to generate improved representations directly from the original conversation. We present UserRepGen-4B, a representation generator trained with hindsight distillation. Across 700 conversations spanning seven datasets, hindsight feedback helps improve user representations at test time, and UserRepGen-4B generates representations that enable more faithful simulation than those generated by GPT-5.5. Beyond conversation reconstruction, learned representations improve simulation fidelity for unseen tasks, better preserve the population-level diversity of real users, and better distinguish users across conversations.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.22518 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.22518v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22518

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Shuhaib Mehri [view email] [v1] Thu, 15 Oct 2026 18:13:21 UTC (596 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Learning User Representations to Improve Simulation Fidelity, by Shuhaib Mehri and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.22518v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: User simulators enable interactive training and evaluation of AI assistants at scale. Yet current simulators struggle to reproduce…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.