AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Learn-by-Wire Training Control Governance: Bounded Autonomous Training Under Stress for Stability and Efficiency

The paper introduces LBW-Guard, a bounded autonomous training control governance layer operating above AdamW. By observing training telemetry and applying bounded control, it improves LLM training stability and efficiency. Experiments on Qwen2.5 models show 18.7% perplexity reduction and 1.10x speedup on the 7B model, and it maintains trainability under aggressive learning rates where AdamW collapses.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Anis Radianis

[2605.19008] Learn-by-Wire Training Control Governance: Bounded Autonomous Training Under Stress for Stability and Efficiency

[Submitted on 18 May 2026]

Title:Learn-by-Wire Training Control Governance: Bounded Autonomous Training Under Stress for Stability and Efficiency

View a PDF of the paper titled Learn-by-Wire Training Control Governance: Bounded Autonomous Training Under Stress for Stability and Efficiency, by Anis Radianis

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Modern language-model training is increasingly exposed to instability, degraded runs, and wasted compute, especially under aggressive learning-rate, scale, and runtime-stress conditions. This paper introduces Learn-by-Wire Guard (LBW-Guard), a bounded autonomous training-control governance layer that operates above AdamW. Rather than replacing the optimizer update rule, LBW-Guard observes training telemetry, interprets instability-sensitive regimes, and applies bounded control to optimizer execution while preserving fixed training objectives.

We evaluate LBW-Guard in a Qwen2.5-centered stress-and-robustness suite using WikiText-103, with Qwen2.5-7B as the empirical anchor, model-size comparisons against Qwen2.5-3B and Qwen2.5-14B, learning-rate stress tests, gradient-clipping baselines, and a no-LoRA TinyLlama-1B full-parameter sanity check. In the 7B reference setting, LBW-Guard reduces final perplexity from 13.21 to 10.74, an 18.7% improvement, while reducing end-to-end time from 392.54s to 357.02s, a 1.10x speedup. Under stronger learning-rate stress, AdamW degrades to 1885.24 final perplexity at LR=3e-3 and 659.76 at LR=1e-3, whereas LBW-Guard remains trainable at 11.57 and 10.33, respectively. Gradient-clipping baselines do not reproduce this effect.

These results support a scoped systems conclusion that stability-sensitive LLM training can benefit from a governance plane above the optimizer. LBW-Guard provides evidence that bounded runtime control can preserve productive compute under stress while remaining distinct from optimizer replacement and local gradient suppression.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.19008 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2605.19008v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.19008

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Anis Radianis [view email] [v1] Mon, 18 May 2026 18:32:25 UTC (24 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Learn-by-Wire Training Control Governance: Bounded Autonomous Training Under Stress for Stability and Efficiency, by Anis Radianis

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)