AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Latent Communication Between Language Model Agents: Channels, Alignment, and the Limits of Text

A new study quantifies information loss when LLM agents communicate via text, using sparse autoencoder feature analysis. While latent communication preserves more information under compression, the lost features primarily encode surface form rather than task-relevant semantics, questioning the practical advantage of latent channels.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Markus Wenzel

-->

[Submitted on 6 May 2026]

Title:Latent Communication Between Language Model Agents: Channels, Alignment, and the Limits of Text

View a PDF of the paper titled Latent Communication Between Language Model Agents: Channels, Alignment, and the Limits of Text, by Markus Wenzel

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Multi-agent systems (MAS) are utilized in many contexts and many professions. Those MAS rely on inter-agent communication, usually implemented by clear-text message passing. We hypothesize that Large Language Models may have a world model at their disposal that exceeds expressibility in text when complex concepts need to be communicated. Our aim is to approach a proof of this hypothesis with structured experiments. In this work, we show that LLM agents communicating via text lose information, which we quantify via Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) feature analysis. We construct three communication channels and measure concept-discriminating information in each. We first show that the SAE-sparse channel retains a 99.4% probe accuracy at 28-fold compression over the dense-latent channel vs 80.4% for the text channel. We then proceed to examine the same for cross-architecture communication by using sparse latent space alignment. We find for Procrustes alignment a 92% top-1 retrieval between Llama and Mistral. Using a text round-trip, we perform feature survival analysis to find that text serialization destroys 88% of SAE features, replacing them with a different feature set. We attribute the loss to identity replacement, not attenuation. By our analysis, we were able to attribute a 3-10pp performance penalty to the linear Procrustes alignment, improving with nonlinear alignment methods. In a task-level evaluation we find that the latent channel matches the text channel on cross-lingual concept tasks but never exceeds it. Text augmentation with latent features provides no benefit, leading us to negative conclusions for the initial hypothesis: lost features mostly or completely encode surface form, not task-relevant semantics. To pinpoint the practical advantage of latent communication over a text channel, deeper tasks eliciting complex concepts and an corresponding analysis framework are needed.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.14103 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.14103v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.14103

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Markus Wenzel [view email] [v1] Wed, 6 May 2026 13:12:00 UTC (1,547 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Latent Communication Between Language Model Agents: Channels, Alignment, and the Limits of Text, by Markus Wenzel

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.MA

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)