Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Knowledge Transfer Scaling Laws for 3D Medical Imaging

Summary

This paper investigates scaling laws for knowledge transfer in 3D medical imaging, revealing asymmetric transfer between modalities and proposing a data allocation optimization that improves performance by up to 58%.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Ho Hin Lee, Dongna Du, Chu Wang, Yuankai Huo, Shi Gu, James C. Gee, Yifan Wu
Knowledge Transfer Scaling Laws for 3D Medical Imaging
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.06859] Knowledge Transfer Scaling Laws for 3D Medical Imaging

[Submitted on 7 May 2026]

Title:Knowledge Transfer Scaling Laws for 3D Medical Imaging

View a PDF of the paper titled Knowledge Transfer Scaling Laws for 3D Medical Imaging, by Ho Hin Lee and 6 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Vision foundation models are increasingly moving beyond 2D to volumetric domains such as 3D medical imaging, where unified pretraining across different imaging modalities (i.e. CT, MRI, and PET) could provide foundational models for diverse clinical tasks. However, training such models requires mixing heterogeneous imaging domains, and current mixture strategies remain largely heuristic. In this work, we observe that different medical imaging domains scale at variable rates during pretraining, and knowledge transfer between domains is strongly asymmetric: training on one domain can substantially improve another, but the reverse may be much weaker. Interestingly, both MAE reconstruction loss and cross-domain transfer follow predictable power-law trends with domain-specific behaviors. Motivated by these findings, we formulate data allocation as a scaling-law optimization problem. The derived allocations reveal an interpretable hub-and-island structure: highly transferable domains emerge as hubs that benefit many others and deserve strategic allocation, while isolated domains act as islands requiring direct investment. Empirically, transfer-aware allocation outperforms data-proportional sampling by up to 58% and generalizes well to unseen budgets with r=0.989. Downstream validation on disease classification and organ/lesion segmentation further confirms that the derived transfer-aware mixtures provide stronger pretrained representations for clinical 3D medical imaging tasks.

Comments: 20 Pages

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.06859 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.06859v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.06859

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ho Hin Lee [view email] [v1] Thu, 7 May 2026 19:00:12 UTC (210 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Knowledge Transfer Scaling Laws for 3D Medical Imaging, by Ho Hin Lee and 6 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Medical imaging domains scale at variable rates during pretraining with asymmetric transfer.
  • MAE loss and cross-domain transfer follow predictable power-law trends.
  • Data allocation is formulated as a scaling-law optimization, revealing a hub-and-island structure.
  • Transfer-aware allocation outperforms data-proportional sampling by up to 58%.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.