AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Knowledge Injection Exists in MoE? Exploring Expert-Aware Contrast Decoding in MoE for Mitigating LLMs'Hallucinations

Existing LLM hallucination mitigation methods either fail to alter internal knowledge or lack cross-domain generalization. Contrastive decoding uses layer-wise differences but has only been studied in transformers. This research investigates mixture-of-experts (MoE) models, finding that while shared-expert MoEs lack layer-wise differences, higher layers exhibit distinct expert activation patterns between factual and non-factual outputs. The proposed EAACD method splits high-layer experts into reliability groups, contrasts their predictions, and amplifies hallucinations from lower-reliability experts as negative references, outperforming baselines on four QA datasets.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Xinyue Fang, Zhiliang Tian, Zhen Huang, Ziyi Pan, Zhihua Wen, Xi Wang, Quntian Fang, Dongsheng Li

-->

[Submitted on 8 May 2026]

Title:Knowledge Injection Exists in MoE? Exploring Expert-Aware Contrast Decoding in MoE for Mitigating LLMs'Hallucinations

View a PDF of the paper titled Knowledge Injection Exists in MoE? Exploring Expert-Aware Contrast Decoding in MoE for Mitigating LLMs'Hallucinations, by Xinyue Fang and 7 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Existing LLM hallucination mitigation methods, including prompt engineering and model optimization, either hardly alter models'internal knowledge or have poor cross-domain generalization. Contrastive decoding mitigates hallucinations by using layer-wise differences in LLMs. However, prior studies only explore transformer-based models (e.g., GPT), ignoring other effective frameworks like mixture-of-experts (MoE) models. Since MoE alters the traditional transformer architecture, we conduct empirical studies to investigate whether similar layer-wise differences exist in MoEs. Our results show that they do not exist in MoE with shared experts; nevertheless, across different MoEs, higher layers exhibit distinct expert activation patterns between factual and non-factual outputs. Building on these, we propose EAACD, an expert-aware adaptive contrast decoding that uses expert differences in MoE's higher layers to mitigate hallucinations on QA tasks. EAACD splits high-layer experts into a higher-reliability group and several lower-reliability groups based on their confidence and consistency. It contrasts the higher-reliability group's prediction with each lower-reliability group's prediction to calibrate the model's original predictions. To strengthen this contrast, EAACD amplifies hallucinations from lower-reliability experts via attention and masking to provide stronger negative references. EAACD outperforms all baselines on four datasets.

Comments: Accepted by ACL2

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.20426 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.20426v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.20426

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Fang Xinyue [view email] [v1] Fri, 8 May 2026 16:30:03 UTC (1,084 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Knowledge Injection Exists in MoE? Exploring Expert-Aware Contrast Decoding in MoE for Mitigating LLMs'Hallucinations, by Xinyue Fang and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)