2026-08-24 04:00 UTCOriginal source2 min readUpdated: 2026-08-24 08:56 UTC

Keep Your Friends Close, and the Right Neighbours Closer: Disaster-Conditioned Kernel-Regularized Graph Attention for Building Damage Classification

arXiv:2608.20548v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Disaster damage is spatial: buildings rarely fail in isolation. Yet using spatial context for damage classification remains surprisingly underexplored, and many pipelines still rely primarily on per-building appearance cues even when the dominant uncertainty is spatially structured. Complicating matters, the right neighbourhood is not the same across events. Floods, hurricanes, and wildfires can exhibit very different clustering behaviour, making spatial reasoning valuable but easy to misuse - naive context aggregation can improve visual coherence while oversmoothing boundaries or propagating structured errors. We study this tension on xBD (the dataset used in the xView2 challenge) in a controlled post-localization, classification-only setup: each building is represented by a pre/post combined (PPC) patch cropped from the provided polygons, and spatial context is modelled with GPS-derived building graphs. Our approach keeps local evidence "close" by preserving strong spatial relationships in disaster damage patterns, while bringing only the right neighbours "closer" through a disaster-type-conditioned graph model that injects a learnable multi-scale spatial kernel prior into attention, allowing the effective neighbourhood scale to adapt across disaster types rather than being learned as a single global smoothing rule. To discourage coherence-by-smoothing, we add a residual de-correlation loss that penalizes positive Moran's~I in prediction residuals. We evaluate the method under event and dataset shift with a leave-one-event-out (LOEO) protocol on xBD and cross-dataset transfer from xBD to Ida-BD. The model improves macro-F1 and substantially reduces residual spatial autocorrelation under zero-shot event shift, indicating better use of spatial context rather than naive smoothing and enabling more reliable transfer to unseen events within known disaster types.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Fuad Hasan, Chul Min Yeum

-->

[Submitted on 20 Aug 2026]

Title:Keep Your Friends Close, and the Right Neighbours Closer: Disaster-Conditioned Kernel-Regularized Graph Attention for Building Damage Classification

View a PDF of the paper titled Keep Your Friends Close, and the Right Neighbours Closer: Disaster-Conditioned Kernel-Regularized Graph Attention for Building Damage Classification, by Fuad Hasan and Chul Min Yeum

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Disaster damage is spatial: buildings rarely fail in isolation. Yet using spatial context for damage classification remains surprisingly underexplored, and many pipelines still rely primarily on per-building appearance cues even when the dominant uncertainty is spatially structured. Complicating matters, the right neighbourhood is not the same across events. Floods, hurricanes, and wildfires can exhibit very different clustering behaviour, making spatial reasoning valuable but easy to misuse - naive context aggregation can improve visual coherence while oversmoothing boundaries or propagating structured errors. We study this tension on xBD (the dataset used in the xView2 challenge) in a controlled post-localization, classification-only setup: each building is represented by a pre/post combined (PPC) patch cropped from the provided polygons, and spatial context is modelled with GPS-derived building graphs. Our approach keeps local evidence "close" by preserving strong spatial relationships in disaster damage patterns, while bringing only the right neighbours "closer" through a disaster-type-conditioned graph model that injects a learnable multi-scale spatial kernel prior into attention, allowing the effective neighbourhood scale to adapt across disaster types rather than being learned as a single global smoothing rule. To discourage coherence-by-smoothing, we add a residual de-correlation loss that penalizes positive Moran's~I in prediction residuals. We evaluate the method under event and dataset shift with a leave-one-event-out (LOEO) protocol on xBD and cross-dataset transfer from xBD to Ida-BD. The model improves macro-F1 and substantially reduces residual spatial autocorrelation under zero-shot event shift, indicating better use of spatial context rather than naive smoothing and enabling more reliable transfer to unseen events within known disaster types.

Comments: Accepted in ECCV 2026

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2608.20548 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2608.20548v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20548

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Fuad Hasan [view email] [v1] Thu, 20 Aug 2026 20:20:10 UTC (2,706 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)