Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Keep the Effect, Drop the Actor: Programmable Effect-to-Execution World-Action Models

Summary

arXiv:2610.02398v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A robot demonstration records two things in the same frames: what happened to the objects, and how one particular arm made it happen. We condition on the first. A demonstration is compiled into an effect program: the 3D keypoint trajectories of the objects that moved, two points marking where each was held, and the configuration the scene ends in, with the demonstrator removed. PEWAM, a 71.5M-parameter world-action model, generates effect, robot execution, action and terminal state as four streams with independent flow-matching times, so clamping a program and sampling the execution turns inference into programming, re-solved closed loop from the live scene. On held-out LIBERO-Goal tasks, one demonstration's program completes 40 of 90 episod…

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Junyi Hu, Zhewen He, Zhenhua Li, Yi Fang
Keep the Effect, Drop the Actor: Programmable Effect-to-Execution World-Action Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 1 Oct 2026]

Title:Keep the Effect, Drop the Actor: Programmable Effect-to-Execution World-Action Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Keep the Effect, Drop the Actor: Programmable Effect-to-Execution World-Action Models, by Junyi Hu and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:A robot demonstration records two things in the same frames: what happened to the objects, and how one particular arm made it happen. We condition on the first. A demonstration is compiled into an effect program: the 3D keypoint trajectories of the objects that moved, two points marking where each was held, and the configuration the scene ends in, with the demonstrator removed. PEWAM, a 71.5M-parameter world-action model, generates effect, robot execution, action and terminal state as four streams with independent flow-matching times, so clamping a program and sampling the execution turns inference into programming, re-solved closed loop from the live scene. On held-out LIBERO-Goal tasks, one demonstration's program completes 40 of 90 episodes, where the same backbone given a goal image or language, and published demonstration-conditioned methods, complete at most 19; on three of Meta-World's held-out classes it exceeds the best published results, though not on the five-class mean. Because a program is a set of coordinates, a person can edit it: the placement follows a shifted terminal state and the grasp turns with rotated contact points. The same program runs on four robot arms without retraining, and after a push, re-solving completes 23 of 60 episodes where replaying the demonstration completes 6. On a Franka arm, fine-tuned on real demonstrations of other tasks, programs compiled from single human videos complete 36 of 40 trials, against 22 for the same backbone conditioned on the video's last frame as a goal image.

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.02398 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.02398v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02398

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zhewen He [view email] [v1] Thu, 1 Oct 2026 19:25:04 UTC (20,677 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Keep the Effect, Drop the Actor: Programmable Effect-to-Execution World-Action Models, by Junyi Hu and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.02398v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A robot demonstration records two things in the same frames: what happened to the objects, and how one particular arm made it happe…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.