Just Keep Prompting: Evaluating Repetitive Socratic Prompting in VLMs
The Just Keep Prompting (JKP) framework tests VLM stability under repeated challenging. Evaluations on GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Qwen3-VL-30B show substantial instability and answer flipping, with model-specific pressure-response profiles.
-->
[Submitted on 1 May 2026]
Title:Just Keep Prompting: Evaluating Repetitive Socratic Prompting in VLMs
View a PDF of the paper titled Just Keep Prompting: Evaluating Repetitive Socratic Prompting in VLMs, by Shayda Moezzi and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Deploying Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in real-world settings requires not only strong visual reasoning but also stability under sustained conversational pressure. We introduce Just Keep Prompting (JKP), a multi-turn evaluation framework that measures VLM epistemic stability when users repeatedly challenge, question, or contradict a model's answer. JKP probes models for up to 10 follow-up turns using three strategies: Adversarial Negation (repeated rejection), Pure Socratic Interrogation (repeated calls to reassess certainty), and Context-Aware Socratic Summarization (reflecting the model's prior rationale back before asking for reconsideration). We evaluate GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Qwen3-VL-30B on a subset of the STAR benchmark across 720 multi-turn runs. Aggregate accuracy changes modestly from Turn 0 to Turn 10, but trajectory-level analysis reveals substantial instability: correct answers regress, wrong answers recover, and many runs exhibit repeated answer flipping. Repeated prompting has bounded upside and often acts as a destabilizer rather than a reasoning aid. The effect is strongly model-dependent: Qwen3-VL-30B achieves the highest final accuracy but becomes confidently wrong under direct contradiction; Gemini 2.5 Pro is comparatively stable but token-expensive; GPT-4o is the most brittle and oscillatory. These findings reveal that multi-turn VLM evaluation captures not just additional reasoning but pressure-response profiles: how models trade off visual grounding, calibration, and conversational compliance under repeated challenge.
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.14099 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.14099v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.14099
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Sarah Ostadabbas [view email] [v1] Fri, 1 May 2026 17:02:19 UTC (2,920 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Just Keep Prompting: Evaluating Repetitive Socratic Prompting in VLMs, by Shayda Moezzi and 4 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new | recent | 2026-07
Change to browse by:
cs cs.AI cs.CV
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)