Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

JUICE: Unified Multimodal Modeling in Pretrained Representation Spaces

Summary

The paper introduces JUICE, a single flow-matching Transformer that models the joint distribution of images and text directly inside frozen pretrained encoder spaces, giving each modality its own noise level so that which modalities are clean and which are generated determines the task. At 2.1B parameters and 224x224 resolution with no language-model initialization, it reports up to 0.88 on GenEval and 73.1 on VQAv2, and it substantially outperforms independent sampling on maze tasks that require image and text to agree.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Jiahan Li, Huangyuan Su, Shengbang Tong, Shusheng Yang, Ruihan Guo, Suozhi Huang, Hexu Zhao, Pratyusha Sharma, Sherry Yang, Jiatao Gu, Rob Fergus, Kyunghyun Cho
JUICE: Unified Multimodal Modeling in Pretrained Representation Spaces
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 20 Oct 2026]

Title:JUICE: Unified Multimodal Modeling in Pretrained Representation Spaces

View a PDF of the paper titled JUICE: Unified Multimodal Modeling in Pretrained Representation Spaces, by Jiahan Li and 11 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Most unified multimodal models treat images and text asymmetrically: a pretrained language model generates text, an attached diffusion head generates images, and outputs that contain both are produced in a fixed order, so the first output cannot adapt to the second. We ask whether both modalities can instead be generated by one process that is trained on them jointly from scratch. Pretrained encoder spaces hold both modalities in one continuous form and carry knowledge learned at scale, and recent work finds them effective as generative targets for vision and language. We therefore model the joint distribution directly in these spaces. We introduce JUICE (Joint Unified multimodal modeling In Continuous Encoder spaces), a single flow matching Transformer over frozen image and text representations, in which each modality has its own noise level. Which modalities are clean and which are generated then decides the task: image generation, captioning, visual question answering, or joint generation. Controlled pretraining runs test each design choice. At equal guidance, generating text as continuous states leaves image generation intact (48.41 GenEval, against 47.86 for a model trained only for text-to-image generation), while captions lose some exact wording. Training on joint and conditional denoising together beats either alone, and semantic encoder spaces beat VAE latents and raw pixels as targets. At 2.1B parameters, with no language model initialization and at 224x224, JUICE reaches up to 0.88 on GenEval and 73.1 on VQAv2. By sampling both modalities from the joint distribution (coupled sampling), it can also draw a route on a map while writing out the matching moves. On mazes with several valid solutions, joint success rises from 54.6% with independent sampling to 93.7%, and no modality has to go first. On visual spatial planning, JUICE solves 99.8% of maps at its training sizes.

Comments: 69 pages, 31 figures, 37 tables. Project page: this https URL Code: this https URL Weights: this https URL

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.28801 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.28801v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.28801

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jiahan Li [view email] [v1] Tue, 20 Oct 2026 18:25:09 UTC (24,163 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled JUICE: Unified Multimodal Modeling in Pretrained Representation Spaces, by Jiahan Li and 11 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • A single flow-matching Transformer generates both modalities in frozen image and text encoder spaces, replacing the asymmetric language-model-plus-diffusion-head design
  • Per-modality noise levels make the task (generation, captioning, VQA, joint generation) an outcome of which modalities are clean rather than a fixed pipeline order
  • At 2.1B parameters it reaches GenEval 0.88 and VQAv2 73.1; continuous text generation preserves image quality but loses some exact caption wording
  • Coupled sampling raises joint maze success from 54.6% to 93.7%, and visual spatial planning solves 99.8% of maps at training sizes

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.