AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Investigating LLM's Problem Solving Capability -- a Study on Statics Questions

A new study evaluates LLM performance on statics problems using a model distillation approach. LLMs perform well on text-only problems but accuracy drops when diagrams and multi-step reasoning are introduced. The decline is primarily due to difficulties in multi-step reasoning, not image recognition limits.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Tanner Culleton, Hung-Fu Chang

[2606.26103] Investigating LLM's Problem Solving Capability -- a Study on Statics Questions

[Submitted on 30 Apr 2026]

Title:Investigating LLM's Problem Solving Capability -- a Study on Statics Questions

View a PDF of the paper titled Investigating LLM's Problem Solving Capability -- a Study on Statics Questions, by Tanner Culleton and Hung-Fu Chang

View PDF

Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly influenced many aspects of society, particularly education, due to their demonstrated ability to complete assignments and examinations across a wide range of subjects. Although prior studies have examined the educational impact of LLMs, much of the existing work relies on public or open problem datasets and lacks topic-specific analysis. In engineering education, especially within mechanical engineering, systematic investigations of LLM performance on specific problem types remain limited. Instead of using traditional methods that directly ask textbook questions to an LLM tool, our study adopts a model distillation process to evaluate LLM capabilities in solving statics problems. By distilling ChatGPT, we extracted 25 text-only statics questions and further constructed two additional datasets by adding diagrams and modifying their numerical values. Experimental results show that while LLMs perform well on text-only statics problems, their accuracy decreases when diagrams are introduced and the problems require multi-step reasoning. Further analysis suggests that this performance drop is not primarily caused by limitations in image recognition, but rather by difficulties in multi-step reasoning and in consistently applying extracted visual information across successive solution stages.

Comments: 9 pages, Engineering and Technology Symposium 2026

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.26103 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.26103v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.26103

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Hung-Fu Chang [view email] [v1] Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:17:09 UTC (791 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Investigating LLM's Problem Solving Capability -- a Study on Statics Questions, by Tanner Culleton and Hung-Fu Chang

View PDF

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)