Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Interpreting Latent CoT Reasoning as Dynamical Systems

Summary

Recent latent reasoning methods like CODI and COCONUT lack interpretability because they maintain multiple superimposed traces. Researchers model these as trajectories in representation space and apply dynamical systems analysis, revealing that CODI behaves as a stable attractor while COCONUT behaves as an unstable expanding system. SIM-CoT supervision tightens both behaviors without changing underlying dynamics.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Sabari Iyyappan Duraipandian, Shreya Sanjay Boyane, Manju Nagesh, Jerome Francis, Archana Vaidheeswaran, Kevin Zhu
Interpreting Latent CoT Reasoning as Dynamical Systems
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 20 Jun 2026]

Title:Interpreting Latent CoT Reasoning as Dynamical Systems

View a PDF of the paper titled Interpreting Latent CoT Reasoning as Dynamical Systems, by Sabari Iyyappan Duraipandian and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Recent latent reasoning methods, such as CODI and COCONUT, face a fundamental interpretability problem: they maintain multiple superimposed candidate traces in the hidden space at each step, unlike explicit- CoT, which follows a single transparent reasoning trace. Existing mechanistic methods show compression, shortcuts, and superposition without explaining how reasoning evolves across latent steps. To address this gap, we model latent token sequences as trajectories in representation space and apply dynamical systems analysis to characterize the evolution of reasoning. Using quantitative measures, such as step-to-step change, direction consistency, and Lyapunov sensitivity, alongside qualitative projections, such as UMAP and DMD/PHATE, we show that latent CoT exhibits structured, non-random dynamics with two distinct stability classes. CODI behaves as a stable attractor, while COCONUT behaves as an unstable expanding system, and SIM-CoT supervision tightens both behaviors without changing the underlying dynamics. This framework advances the interpretability of latent CoT reasoning dynamics and provides actionable insights for improving latent reasoning performance. Code1 and Project page2 available online.

Comments: 15 pages, ICML 2026 FoGen Workshop

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.09698 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.09698v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.09698

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jerome Francis [view email] [v1] Sat, 20 Jun 2026 16:02:55 UTC (8,574 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Interpreting Latent CoT Reasoning as Dynamical Systems, by Sabari Iyyappan Duraipandian and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Latent CoT methods face an interpretability problem due to multiple candidate traces.
  • Dynamical systems analysis (e.g., Lyapunov sensitivity, UMAP) shows structured dynamics.
  • CODI acts as a stable attractor; COCONUT as an unstable expanding system.
  • SIM-CoT supervision strengthens both behaviors without altering the fundamental dynamics.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.