Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

IntentGrasp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Intent Understanding

Summary

IntentGrasp is a large-scale, multi-domain benchmark for evaluating LLMs' intent understanding, derived from 49 corpora across 12 domains. It includes a training set of 262,759 instances and two evaluation sets. Tests on 20 LLMs show performance far below human level (81.1%), but the proposed Intentional Fine-Tuning (IFT) yields significant gains and strong cross-domain generalization.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Yuwei Yin, Chuyuan Li, Giuseppe Carenini
IntentGrasp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Intent Understanding
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.06832] IntentGrasp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Intent Understanding

[Submitted on 7 May 2026]

Title:IntentGrasp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Intent Understanding

View a PDF of the paper titled IntentGrasp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Intent Understanding, by Yuwei Yin and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Accurately understanding the intent behind speech, conversation, and writing is crucial to the development of helpful Large Language Model (LLM) assistants. This paper introduces IntentGrasp, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the intent understanding capability of LLMs. Derived from 49 high-quality, open-licensed corpora spanning 12 diverse domains, IntentGrasp is constructed through source datasets curation, intent label contextualization, and task format unification. IntentGrasp contains a large-scale training set of 262,759 instances and two evaluation sets: an All Set of 12,909 test cases and a more balanced and challenging Gem Set of 470 cases. Extensive evaluations on 20 LLMs across 7 families (including frontier models such as GPT-5.4, Gemini-3.1-Pro, and Claude-Opus-4.7) demonstrate unsatisfactory performance, with scores below 60% on All Set and below 25% on Gem set. Notably, 17 out of 20 tested models perform worse than a random-guess baseline (15.2%) on Gem Set, while the estimated human performance is ~81.1%, showing substantial room for improvement. To enhance such ability, this paper proposes Intentional Fine-Tuning (IFT), which fine-tunes the models on the training set in IntentGrasp, yielding significant gains of 30+ F1 points on All Set and 20+ points on Gem Set. Tellingly, the leave-one-domain-out (Lodo) experiments further demonstrate the strong cross-domain generalizability of IFT, verifying that it is a promising approach to substantially enhancing the intent understanding of LLMs. Overall, by benchmarking and boosting intent understanding ability, this study sheds light on a promising path towards more intentional, capable, and safe AI assistants for human benefits and social good.

Comments: IntentGrasp data is available on [Hugging Face](this https URL), and the code is released on [GitHub](this https URL)

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

ACM classes: I.2.7

Cite as: arXiv:2605.06832 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.06832v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.06832

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yuwei Yin [view email] [v1] Thu, 7 May 2026 18:34:27 UTC (439 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled IntentGrasp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Intent Understanding, by Yuwei Yin and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • IntentGrasp covers 12 domains with 262,759 training instances, 12,909 in All Set, and 470 in Gem Set.
  • 17 of 20 LLMs underperform random guess (15.2%) on Gem Set; human performance is ~81.1%.
  • IFT fine-tuning boosts F1 by 30+ points on All Set and 20+ points on Gem Set.
  • Leave-one-domain-out experiments demonstrate strong cross-domain generalizability of IFT.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.