Intelligence per Watt: A Unified Metric for the AI Era
Proposes 'Intelligence Per Watt' (IPW) as a metric for AI system efficiency, analogous to performance-per-watt in computing. Local models answer 88.7% of single-turn queries, and hybrid inference can cut energy and costs by 60-80%. IPW also measures economic value and national competitiveness via 'Gross Domestic Intelligence' (GDI).
01
Vision Statement
From 1946 to 2009, computing efficiency—performance per watt—doubled every 1.5 years. This trend, documented by Koomey and colleagues, transformed where computing could happen. Workloads migrated from mainframe rooms to desktops, then laptops, then pockets. The transition from centralized time-sharing to personal computing didn't occur because PCs surpassed mainframes in raw performance. It occurred when efficiency gains made computing capable enough within the power constraints of personal devices.
We're at the same inflection point for artificial intelligence.
Today, most AI queries flow through centralized datacenters while demand grows at steep rates: 1300× increases in token processing, year-over-year scaling that strains power grids. Yet telemetry shows that 77% of requests are practical tasks—writing emails, summarizing documents, seeking information—that don't require frontier-scale models.
We propose INTELLIGENCE PER WATT (IPW)—task accuracy per unit of power—as a unified metric for understanding this transition. Just as performance-per-watt guided the mainframe-to-PC shift, intelligence-per-watt clarifies the path from centralized AI to distributed intelligence. IPW provides a common framework for studying three questions shaping AI's future:
Workload Redistribution: From Cloud to Edge
Local language models (≤20B parameters) now accurately answer 88.7% of single-turn queries, and consumer accelerators run them at interactive latencies. IPW improved 5.3× from 2023–2025—3.1× from model advances, 1.7× from hardware gains. By measuring intelligence efficiency across the model-hardware landscape, we can identify which queries belong on which devices. Hybrid systems that route queries appropriately cut energy, compute, and cost by 60–80% while preserving quality. IPW tracks this redistribution as it unfolds.
Economic Value: Measuring AI's Real-World Impact
Not all intelligence is equal. A model that handles graduate-level physics but fails at email drafting delivers different economic value than one with the opposite profile. By weighting IPW against GDP-relevant task distributions, we can quantify how much economic value AI systems generate per watt consumed. This lens reveals where current systems create value, where gaps remain, and how efficiency gains translate into productivity across economic sectors.
National Competitiveness: The Global AI Race
The nation that most efficiently converts energy into deployed intelligence gains advantage. We introduce Gross Domestic Intelligence (GDI)—the product of intelligence-per-watt and accessible power—as a framework for AI competition. China and the United States face inverse constraints: China is compute-bound by export controls on advanced chips; America is energy-bound by grid limitations and datacenter bottlenecks. IPW reveals an asymmetric American asset: hundreds of millions of local accelerators already deployed in homes and offices. This installed base could boost effective AI capacity 2–4× without new datacenter construction.
The path forward: Intelligence per watt should be a north star metric for model architecture, hardware design, and national strategy. We're building the measurement infrastructure, benchmarks, and systems to make this concrete—and releasing our tools for others to use.
02
The IPW Research Agenda
We're pursuing a coordinated research program to understand and maximize intelligence efficiency across the full stack.
Category Initiative Objective
Measurement & Benchmarking GDP-Weighted Evaluation Quantifying economic value generated per watt on real-world, GDP-relevant tasks.
Measurement & Benchmarking IPW Attribution Decomposing efficiency gains into algorithmic versus hardware contributions through continuous benchmarking.
National Competitiveness Gross Domestic Intelligence Identifying high-impact interventions across inference systems, power grids, and model architectures.
Models & Systems Post-training for IPW Training local models to use frontier models as tools for verification and sophisticated assistance.
Models & Systems Hybrid Inference Engine Building systems that automatically route work between local and cloud compute to maximize IPW subject to latency, privacy, and cost constraints.
03
Papers + Code
Publications
📰 Article
China's AI Heist
A Foreign Affairs essay on how the United States should respond to Beijing's unauthorized "distillation" of frontier AI models, and what safeguarding America's lead in AI will require.
Read in Foreign Affairs →
📄 Publication
Intelligence Per Watt: Measuring Intelligence Efficiency of Local AI
Introduces "intelligence per watt" (IPW) as a metric for measuring AI efficiency, finding that local LMs can answer 88.7% of single-turn reasoning & chat queries and that hybrid local-cloud routing cuts energy use by 64% and costs by 59% compared to cloud-only inference.
Paper (arXiv) → Blog Post →
📄 Publication
Maximizing American Gross Domestic Intelligence with Hybrid Inference
Proposes "Gross Domestic Intelligence" (GDI) as a framework for national AI competitiveness, arguing that the U.S. can boost effective inference capacity 2–4× by activating the 70–80M AI-capable devices already deployed in American homes and offices alongside cloud infrastructure.
Blog Post →
📄 Publication
OpenJarvis: Personal AI, On Personal Devices
An open-source framework for building personal AI agents that run entirely on-device, providing composable primitives for local AI systems that prioritize efficiency and privacy by keeping user data on personal hardware rather than routing through cloud services.
Paper (arXiv) → Blog Post →
📄 Publication
Minions: Cost-efficient Collaboration Between On-device and Cloud Language Models
Introduces protocols for local-cloud LM collaboration on long-document reasoning tasks, where MinionS reduces cloud costs by 5.7× while maintaining 97.9% of frontier model accuracy by decomposing tasks into parallelizable subtasks executed locally.
Paper (arXiv) → Blog Post →
📄 Publication
Archon: An Architecture Search Framework for Inference-Time Techniques
An automated framework for optimizing inference-time techniques in LLMs, exploring a large design space to discover optimized configurations. Archon-designed systems outperform frontier models such as OpenAI's o1, GPT-4o, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet by an average of 15.1% across instruction-following, reasoning, and coding tasks.
Paper (arXiv) →
📄 Publication
Weaver: Shrinking the Generation-Verification Gap with Weak Verifiers
A framework combining multiple imperfect verifiers to evaluate language model responses. Uses weighted ensembles of weaker verification systems with weak supervision to estimate accuracy, achieving competitive results with smaller models that approach the performance of advanced systems like o3-mini.
Paper (arXiv) →
Code + Tools
🔧 Code & Tools
IPW Profiling Harness
Open-source benchmarking suite that profiles LLM inference across NVIDIA, AMD, and Apple Silicon, measuring energy consumption, power draw, latency, and throughput to compute intelligence-per-watt metrics for any model-accelerator configuration.
GitHub Repository →
🔧 Code & Tools
OpenJarvis
Open-source toolkit for building and deploying personal AI agents on local hardware. Provides composable primitives, device-optimized model serving, and privacy-preserving pipelines for on-device intelligence.
GitHub Repository → Docs →
🔧 Code & Tools
Minions
Reference implementation for local-cloud LM collaboration protocols. Includes MinionS and Minion strategies for decomposing tasks across on-device and cloud models to reduce costs while preserving accuracy.
GitHub Repository →
🔧 Code & Tools
Archon
Architecture search framework for automatically discovering optimized inference-time technique configurations across LLMs, including generation ensembling, fusion, ranking, and verification strategies.
GitHub Repository →
🔧 Code & Tools
Weaver
Toolkit for building weighted ensembles of weak verifiers to evaluate language model outputs. Enables scalable verification using smaller, cost-efficient models with weak supervision techniques.
GitHub Repository →
Related Works
A collection of resources that inform and connect to Intelligence Per Watt research.
Algorithmic Progress in Language Models
How Fast is Algorithmic Progress in AI Inference?
LLM Inference Price Trends (Epoch AI)
Compute Equivalent Gain (CEG) Accounting
Inference Efficiency Analysis
Training Compute-Optimal Models
Green Grid Metrics
Zeus: ML Energy Measurement
AI Energy Score (Hugging Face)
Energy Considerations for LLM Inference
MLCommons Inference Benchmark
MLCommons Inference Policies
LLM Energy Measurement
ML Energy Measurement Tutorial
The Simple Macroeconomics of AI (Acemoglu)
Thoughts on AI and Economics (Boaz Barak)
How AI is Transforming Work at Anthropic
Remote Labor AI
LLM Labor Market Demand Analysis
GDPVal Dataset
Snorkel AI Leaderboard
IBM Enterprise Ops Benchmark
APEX Benchmark
INFaaS: Automated Model-less Inference
MIT Iceberg
Cisco Unified Edge Computing
LLM Router
Efficient Inference Routing
06
People
Principal Investigators
Christopher Ré
Principal Investigator
Azalia Mirhoseini
Principal Investigator
John Hennessy
Principal Investigator
PhD Students
Jon Saad-Falcon
PhD Student
Avanika Narayan
PhD Student
Master's Students
Herumb Shandilya
Master's Student
MH
Matthew Hart
Master's Student
Undergraduates
Hakki Orhun Akengin
Undergraduate
Tanvir Bhathal
Undergraduate
Gabriel Bo
Undergraduate
Adrian Gamarra Lafuente
Undergraduate
J. Wes Griffin
Undergraduate
Robby Manihani
Undergraduate
Andrew Park
Undergraduate
Industry Collaborators
Jared Dunnmon
Industry Collaborator
Chuan Li
Lambda Labs
Caia Costello
Lambda Labs
Sponsors & Labs
Sponsors
Labs
04
Blog
May 15, 2026 · Hazy Research ↗
From Minions to OpenJarvis: A Retrospective on Two Years in Local AI
A look back at two years of research on local AI — tracing the path from Minions through to OpenJarvis, the lessons learned along the way, and where on-device intelligence is headed next.
March 17, 2026
How Close Are Local Models to the Cloud? An OpenJarvis Benchmark Study
We used OpenJarvis to run a head-to-head evaluation of 8 local open-source models against 6 frontier cloud models across 5 representative use-case benchmarks. The headline: local models rank within the top 3 overall.
March 12, 2026 · Scaling Intelligence Lab ↗
OpenJarvis: Personal AI, On Personal Devices
An open-source framework for personal AI agents that run entirely on-device. OpenJarvis provides composable primitives, treats efficiency as a first-class constraint, and lets models improve locally from interaction traces while keeping user data on personal hardware.
November 11, 2025 · Hazy Research ↗
Intelligence Per Watt: A Study of Local Intelligence Efficiency
Introduces Intelligence Per Watt (IPW) as a metric for how effectively inference systems convert energy into accurate computation. Local LMs handle 88.7% of single-turn chat queries while IPW improved 5.3× over two years — pointing toward a shift from centralized cloud to distributed edge inference.
Avanika Narayan, Jon Saad-Falcon · March 17, 2026
TL;DR — We used OpenJarvis to run a head-to-head evaluation of 8 local open-source models against 6 frontier cloud models across 5 representative use-case benchmarks. The headline: local models rank within the top 3 overall, with the best local model (Qwen3.5:122B-A10B, 0.840 avg accuracy) matching or exceeding frontier cloud models like Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4. When you factor in that local inference costs $0 in API fees (you already own the hardware), the picture starts to get very interesting.
The Eval Setup
Tasks — We designed 5 use-case benchmarks that mirror
[truncated for AI cost control]