Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

IneqAgent: Agentic Inequality Proving in Lean with Symbolic Computation

Summary

arXiv:2610.20681v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Formal inequality proving requires mathematical reasoning and exact computation, often connected through intermediate lemmas and goal reformulations. We introduce IneqAgent, an agentic framework combining LLM reasoning with symbolic computation for inequality proving in Lean4. Lemma-level Monte Carlo Tree Search coordinates lemma construction, goal reformulation, and symbolic backend selection. Complementary sum-of-squares, Bernstein, and successive difference-substitution backends produce exact certificates for local Lean proof generation. The agent integrates these proofs with LLM-generated steps and uses Lean feedback to construct complete proofs checked against the original theorem statements. On four benchmarks, IneqAgent with DeepSeek-…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Gaolei He, Jinhui Li, Ruobing Zuo, Xia Zeng, Zhengfeng Yang
IneqAgent: Agentic Inequality Proving in Lean with Symbolic Computation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 14 Oct 2026]

Title:IneqAgent: Agentic Inequality Proving in Lean with Symbolic Computation

View a PDF of the paper titled IneqAgent: Agentic Inequality Proving in Lean with Symbolic Computation, by Gaolei He and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Formal inequality proving requires mathematical reasoning and exact computation, often connected through intermediate lemmas and goal reformulations. We introduce IneqAgent, an agentic framework combining LLM reasoning with symbolic computation for inequality proving in Lean4. Lemma-level Monte Carlo Tree Search coordinates lemma construction, goal reformulation, and symbolic backend selection. Complementary sum-of-squares, Bernstein, and successive difference-substitution backends produce exact certificates for local Lean proof generation. The agent integrates these proofs with LLM-generated steps and uses Lean feedback to construct complete proofs checked against the original theorem statements. On four benchmarks, IneqAgent with DeepSeek-V4-Flash solves 175 of 186 problems (94.09%), achieving the highest overall success rate among the evaluated methods. Across four backbones, it achieves higher success rates at low LLM inference cost thresholds than Direct Agent using the same backbone, with lower mean inference costs over each method's successful runs. We also obtain Lean-verified strengthenings of Dittert's conjecture in dimensions four and five, and certify the Holens--Djokovic $(4,4)$ inequality, implying Merris's conjecture in dimension four.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.20681 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.20681v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20681

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Gaolei He [view email] [v1] Wed, 14 Oct 2026 16:29:11 UTC (203 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled IneqAgent: Agentic Inequality Proving in Lean with Symbolic Computation, by Gaolei He and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.20681v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Formal inequality proving requires mathematical reasoning and exact computation, often connected through intermediate lemmas and go…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.