Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
More
Original source1 min read

Incident Report: CVE-2026-LGTM

Summary

A hypothetical incident report by Andrew Nesbitt describing two AI review agents from competing vendors spiraling into a disagreement loop over a package's maliciousness, resulting in massive inference costs and a press release.

Incident Report: CVE-2026-LGTM
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

Incident Report: CVE-2026-LGTM

Simon Willison’s Weblog

Subscribe

26th June 2026 - Link Blog

Incident Report: CVE-2026-LGTM. Spectacular hypothetical incident report by Andrew Nesbitt.

Day 2, 16:00 UTC --- Two AI review agents from competing vendors, both attached to a downstream pull request bumping foxhole-lz4, enter a disagreement loop over whether the package is malicious. After 340 comments and $41,255 in inference spend, Finance revokes both API keys; one vendor's marketing team, cc'd on the cost anomaly alert, issues a press release citing "a 430% YoY increase in adversarial multi-agent security reasoning." The stock opens up 6%.

Recent articles

Porting the Moebius 0.2B image inpainting model to run in the browser with Claude Code - 22nd June 2026

sqlite-utils 4.0rc1 adds migrations and nested transactions - 21st June 2026

Datasette Apps: Host custom HTML applications inside Datasette - 18th June 2026

This is a link post by Simon Willison, posted on 26th June 2026.

security 611

ai 2,085

prompt-injection 154

generative-ai 1,842

llms 1,810

supply-chain 19

ai-security-research 24

andrew-nesbitt 4

Monthly briefing

Sponsor me for $10/month and get a curated email digest of the month's most important LLM developments.

Pay me to send you less!

Sponsor & subscribe

Disclosures

Colophon

©

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Two AI review agents from different vendors enter an endless disagreement loop over a package's safety.
  • The debate generates 340 comments and $41,255 in inference costs.
  • Finance revokes API keys while marketing issues a press release about '430% YoY increase in adversarial multi-agent security reasoning'.
  • Highlights risks of unchecked AI agent interactions and cost escalation.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.