AI News HubLIVE
站內改寫2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Hybrid Feedback Sampling for Sample-Efficient Model Predictive Control

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2608.19443v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Thanks to its parallelizability and flexibility, sampling-based Model Predictive Control (MPC) has become widely popular for controlling real-world robotic systems. However, for high-dimensional and open-loop unstable dynamical systems, the required number of samples to improve the control sequence will grow exponentially with the horizon, leading to poor sample efficiency and numerical instability. This paper investigates the instability of shooting methods in sampling-based MPC and shows that the optimal sampling proposal distribution can be realized by sampling with an optimized feedback policy. We refer to this algorithm as Feedback Sampling MPC (FS-MPC). FS-MPC involves a hybrid sampling design which balances local and global search based on the system stability and the available computation budget. Our theoretical analysis shows that our hybrid sampling approach achieves faster convergence than standard MPPI and better optimality than standard feedback sampling. Empirically, in diverse contact-rich control tasks like humanoid loco-manipulation and dexterous manipulation, we show that FS-MPC successfully tackles dynamically unstable tasks where standard sample-based approaches struggle, and strictly outperforms feedback policies alone. Finally, we validate our method on humanoid robot locomotion and manipulation tasks in the real world.

來源arXiv Robotics作者: Chaoyi Pan, Zeji Yi, John Zhang, Zachary Manchester, Guannan Qu, Guanya Shi

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

--> [Submitted on 19 Aug 2026] Title:Hybrid Feedback Sampling for Sample-Efficient Model Predictive Control View a PDF of the paper titled Hybrid Feedback Sampling for Sample-Efficient Model Predictive Control, by Chaoyi Pan and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Thanks to its parallelizability and flexibility, sampling-based Model Predictive Control (MPC) has become widely popular for controlling real-world robotic systems. However, for high-dimensional and open-loop unstable dynamical systems, the required number of samples to improve the control sequence will grow exponentially with the horizon, leading to poor sample efficiency and numerical instability. This paper investigates the instability of shooting methods in sampling-based MPC and shows that the optimal sampling proposal distribution can be realized by sampling with an optimized feedback policy. We refer to this algorithm as Feedback Sampling MPC (FS-MPC). FS-MPC involves a hybrid sampling design which balances local and global search based on the system stability and the available computation budget. Our theoretical analysis shows that our hybrid sampling approach achieves faster convergence than standard MPPI and better optimality than standard feedback sampling. Empirically, in diverse contact-rich control tasks like humanoid loco-manipulation and dexterous manipulation, we show that FS-MPC successfully tackles dynamically unstable tasks where standard sample-based approaches struggle, and strictly outperforms feedback policies alone. Finally, we validate our method on humanoid robot locomotion and manipulation tasks in the real world. Comments: 15 pages, 6 figures Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO); Systems and Control (eess.SY) Cite as: arXiv:2608.19443 [cs.RO] (or arXiv:2608.19443v1 [cs.RO] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19443 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Chaoyi Pan [view email] [v1] Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:56:18 UTC (6,902 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Hybrid Feedback Sampling for Sample-Efficient Model Predictive Control, by Chaoyi Pan and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.RO new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.SY eess eess.SY References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)