Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

How to Use Parallel Data for Multilingual Pretraining

Summary

A new paper examines how to explicitly exploit parallel data structure during multilingual pretraining, finding that parallel pretraining (PPT) alone does not consistently improve language understanding, but a two-stage approach—PPT to build a cross-lingual foundation followed by standard pretraining to adapt it—consistently beats standard pretraining in both high- and low-resource settings.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Zhihong Huang, Yao Lu, Derek F. Wong, Hamid Alinejad-Rokny, Min Yang
How to Use Parallel Data for Multilingual Pretraining
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 20 Oct 2026]

Title:How to Use Parallel Data for Multilingual Pretraining

View a PDF of the paper titled How to Use Parallel Data for Multilingual Pretraining, by Zhihong Huang and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:High-quality human-translated parallel corpora can improve cross-lingual transfer, but are typically too small for large-scale pretraining. Machine-translated web corpora help overcome this limitation, making parallel data available at pretraining scale. Standard multilingual pretraining, however, samples source documents and their translations independently, without explicitly using their parallel structure. We investigate how to use the parallel structure of the data to improve multilingual pretraining by concatenating each document with its translation in the same training sequence. We compare this parallel pretraining (PPT) approach with standard pretraining (SPT), training models from scratch at matched token budgets. Surprisingly, despite the benefits of parallel data reported in prior cross-lingual work, PPT alone does not consistently improve language understanding over SPT. Our further analysis suggests that although PPT builds a strong cross-lingual foundation, as shown by its better use of shared information across languages, the mismatch between parallel training contexts and single-language task inputs limits its gains in general language understanding. This finding motivates a two-stage approach following the pretraining-fine-tuning paradigm: we first use PPT to build a cross-lingual foundation, then continue with SPT to adapt it to standard language modeling. In both high-resource and low-resource settings, the two-stage approach consistently improves general language understanding and cross-lingual task performance over standard pretraining alone at matched training budgets.

Comments: 18 pages, 7 figures, 14 tables

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.28838 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.28838v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.28838

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zhihong Huang [view email] [v1] Tue, 20 Oct 2026 19:07:04 UTC (1,246 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled How to Use Parallel Data for Multilingual Pretraining, by Zhihong Huang and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • The authors propose parallel pretraining (PPT), concatenating each document with its translation in the same training sequence, and compare it against standard pretraining (SPT) with models trained from scratch at matched token budgets.
  • PPT alone does not consistently improve general language understanding, because parallel training contexts mismatch single-language task inputs.
  • A two-stage PPT-then-SPT approach consistently outperforms standard pretraining alone in both high-resource and low-resource settings.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.