Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

How LLMs Fail and Generalize in RTL Coding for Hardware Design?

Summary

A new study introduces an error taxonomy for LLMs in hardware design, revealing a ceiling on VerilogEval at 90.8% pass rate due to unsolvable functional errors. Alignment techniques only teach compilation, not reasoning.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Guan-Ting Liu, Chao-Han Huck Yang, Chenhui Deng, Zhongzhi Yu, Brucek Khailany, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang
How LLMs Fail and Generalize in RTL Coding for Hardware Design?
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2606.19347] How LLMs Fail and Generalize in RTL Coding for Hardware Design?

[Submitted on 26 Apr 2026]

Title:How LLMs Fail and Generalize in RTL Coding for Hardware Design?

View a PDF of the paper titled How LLMs Fail and Generalize in RTL Coding for Hardware Design?, by Guan-Ting Liu and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Translating sequential programming priors into the parallel temporal logic of hardware design remains a crucial bottleneck for large language models(LLM). To investigate this, we introduce a new error taxonomy grounded in problem solvability, inspired by cognitive theory. Our taxonomy categorizes failures into syntactic, semantic, solvable functional, and unsolvable functional types. Evaluations reveal a strict empirical ceiling on the VerilogEval benchmark, as frontier models plateau at a 90.8% initial pass rate. These plateaus are defined by unsolvable functional errors, exposing persistent knowledge gaps immune to test time compute scaling. Furthermore, we expose a striking surface convergence gap: optimization readily eliminates syntax errors but concurrently exacerbates deeper functional failures. Our findings demonstrate that alignment techniques merely teach models to compile. While repeated sampling strategies can patch solvable errors, register-transfer level(RTL) coding capacity remains strictly bounded by pretraining knowledge. Addressing challenges in the current LLM based hardware generation pipeline requires more studies in model reasoning rather than alignment interventions.

Comments: Preview, under submission for EMNLP 2026

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Programming Languages (cs.PL)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.19347 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.19347v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.19347

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Guan-Ting Liu [view email] [v1] Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:34:49 UTC (485 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled How LLMs Fail and Generalize in RTL Coding for Hardware Design?, by Guan-Ting Liu and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.PL

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • New error taxonomy categorizes LLM failures into syntactic, semantic, solvable functional, and unsolvable functional types.
  • Frontier models plateau at 90.8% on VerilogEval; unsolvable functional errors persist despite test-time compute scaling.
  • Optimization removes syntax errors but worsens functional failures, showing alignment only improves compilation.
  • Addressing RTL coding limits requires focusing on model reasoning rather than alignment interventions.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.