Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Hindsight Bias in Clinical Temporal Reasoning: How Future Data Exposure Affects Large Language Model Judgment

Summary

arXiv:2609.13454v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Clinical decisions are prospective, but clinical language models are often evaluated on retrospective records that reveal the final diagnosis, treatment response, and outcome. Such evaluations may reward the use of future information rather than reasoning under the uncertainty present at the decision point. We introduce a paired benchmark for measuring outcome-conditioned shifts consistent with hindsight bias in clinical temporal reasoning. It contains 171 case reports from the PubMed Central Open Access Subset---40 sepsis and 131 GLP-1/diabetes cases---represented as both textual narratives and human-annotated and LLM-generated textual time series (TTS). For each case, questions are tied to a clinically meaningful cutoff and paired with a p…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Misaki Matsuura, Sayantan Kumar, Ojas Kadam, Jeremy C. Weiss
Hindsight Bias in Clinical Temporal Reasoning: How Future Data Exposure Affects Large Language Model Judgment
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 11 Sep 2026]

Title:Hindsight Bias in Clinical Temporal Reasoning: How Future Data Exposure Affects Large Language Model Judgment

View a PDF of the paper titled Hindsight Bias in Clinical Temporal Reasoning: How Future Data Exposure Affects Large Language Model Judgment, by Misaki Matsuura and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Clinical decisions are prospective, but clinical language models are often evaluated on retrospective records that reveal the final diagnosis, treatment response, and outcome. Such evaluations may reward the use of future information rather than reasoning under the uncertainty present at the decision point. We introduce a paired benchmark for measuring outcome-conditioned shifts consistent with hindsight bias in clinical temporal reasoning. It contains 171 case reports from the PubMed Central Open Access Subset---40 sepsis and 131 GLP-1/diabetes cases---represented as both textual narratives and human-annotated and LLM-generated textual time series (TTS). For each case, questions are tied to a clinically meaningful cutoff and paired with a prospective reference answer and an outcome-consistent \emph{hindsight trap}. Models answer each question using either a TTS truncated at the cutoff or the complete timeline; additional conditions vary the narrative source (original or synthetic) and TTS annotation source (human or LLM). We evaluate accuracy (Acc), hindsight trap rate (HTR), answer instability rate (AIR), and hindsight bias rate (HBR), each of which captures different signals of hindsight bias. Across GPT 5.6 Sol, Gemma 4, GLM 5.2, and Opus 5, full timeline exposure produces consistent hindsight-sensitive shifts, while temporal masking reduces bias without lowering accuracy.

Comments: Machine Learning for Health Symposium (ML4H 2026)

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.13454 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.13454v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13454

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Sayantan Kumar [view email] [v1] Fri, 11 Sep 2026 19:15:20 UTC (2,209 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Hindsight Bias in Clinical Temporal Reasoning: How Future Data Exposure Affects Large Language Model Judgment, by Misaki Matsuura and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.13454v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Clinical decisions are prospective, but clinical language models are often evaluated on retrospective records that reveal the final…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.