Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

H2DF: Calibrated Target Bands for Controllable Language-Model Unlearning

Summary

arXiv:2610.26864v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Gradient ascent (GA) is a simple language-model unlearning baseline, but it continues increasing forget loss after useful forgetting has occurred. This unbounded pressure can damage retained utility and make forgotten examples abnormally high-loss. We introduce H2DF, a calibrated target-band objective that applies GA-like pressure below a data-dependent lower target and suppresses, or reverses, that pressure after the target region is reached. The targets are estimated from matched non-member examples before training, so the base objective requires one forget-batch forward/backward pass per optimization step; our reported TOFU variant adds sparse retain replay every tenth step. We instantiate a one-sided objective for TOFU question answering…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Jupiter Yao
H2DF: Calibrated Target Bands for Controllable Language-Model Unlearning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 26 Jun 2026]

Title:H2DF: Calibrated Target Bands for Controllable Language-Model Unlearning

View a PDF of the paper titled H2DF: Calibrated Target Bands for Controllable Language-Model Unlearning, by Jupiter Yao

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Gradient ascent (GA) is a simple language-model unlearning baseline, but it continues increasing forget loss after useful forgetting has occurred. This unbounded pressure can damage retained utility and make forgotten examples abnormally high-loss. We introduce H2DF, a calibrated target-band objective that applies GA-like pressure below a data-dependent lower target and suppresses, or reverses, that pressure after the target region is reached. The targets are estimated from matched non-member examples before training, so the base objective requires one forget-batch forward/backward pass per optimization step; our reported TOFU variant adds sparse retain replay every tenth step. We instantiate a one-sided objective for TOFU question answering and a two-sided objective for MUSE-News language modeling. Across three TOFU seeds, H2DF obtains a forget NLL of 1.528 with margin 0.049 and retain NLL of 1.165 with margin 0.047, matching GradDiff while using retain replay only every tenth step and showing substantially lower variability than GA. On MUSE-News, H2DF improves retention over GA and NPO and is competitive with SimNPO, but does not dominate it. Ablations show that the upper target reduces overshoot and that validation-based checkpoint selection is important. These results support calibrated target bands as a practical mechanism for controlling forgetting strength, while also exposing sensitivity to random seed and calibration quality.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.26864 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.26864v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.26864

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jupiter Yao [view email] [v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 06:51:15 UTC (17 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled H2DF: Calibrated Target Bands for Controllable Language-Model Unlearning, by Jupiter Yao

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.26864v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Gradient ascent (GA) is a simple language-model unlearning baseline, but it continues increasing forget loss after useful forgettin…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.