Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Greener Than Humans? Environmental Attitudes in Large Language Models

Summary

A study benchmarks 31 LLMs on environmental attitudes, finding many more progressive than average humans, but with context sensitivity and sycophancy issues.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Stefanie Kunkel, Tilman Hartwig, Marcus Voss, Emma K. Sch\"utt, Angelika Gellrich
Greener Than Humans? Environmental Attitudes in Large Language Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2606.02741] Greener Than Humans? Environmental Attitudes in Large Language Models

[Submitted on 1 Jun 2026]

Title:Greener Than Humans? Environmental Attitudes in Large Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Greener Than Humans? Environmental Attitudes in Large Language Models, by Stefanie Kunkel and Tilman Hartwig and Marcus Voss and Emma K. Sch\"utt and Angelika Gellrich

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in sustainability-related decision support, reporting, and public communication, yet little systematic evidence exists on the environmental attitudes embedded in their outputs. This paper develops a benchmark for evaluating environmental cognition, affect, and behavioural recommendations in LLMs and applies it to 31 widely used proprietary and open-weight models. Drawing on questions from established environmental awareness surveys and additional sustainability-related behavioural measures, we compare LLM responses 1) among models and 2) between models and human survey benchmarks from Germany. We assess their robustness across prompting conditions. We find that many LLMs align more closely with environmentally progressive attitudes than the average survey respondent, exhibiting higher levels of environmental affect and cognition and recommending behaviours associated with substantial potential CO2 reductions. At the same time, we observe no systematic relationship between sustainability-oriented responses and model origin, size, or release context. However, models exhibit contextual sensitivity, controlled by persona-based prompting and show sycophantic shifts mirroring user-specified ideological positions, which raises concerns about steerability and normative reliability in real-world deployments. Our findings provide a reusable evaluation framework for assessing sustainability-related value alignment in LLMs and highlight the importance of governance, transparency, and critical oversight as AI systems become increasingly embedded in sustainability transformations and public decision-making.

Comments: Code can be found at this https URL Benchmark data and results can be found at this https URL

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.02741 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.02741v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.02741

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Tilman Hartwig [view email] [v1] Mon, 1 Jun 2026 18:05:53 UTC (469 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Greener Than Humans? Environmental Attitudes in Large Language Models, by Stefanie Kunkel and Tilman Hartwig and Marcus Voss and Emma K. Sch\"utt and Angelika Gellrich

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CY

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Develops a benchmark to evaluate environmental cognition, affect, and behavioral recommendations in LLMs.
  • Many LLMs align with more environmentally progressive attitudes than average human survey respondents in Germany.
  • No systematic relationship found between sustainability-oriented responses and model origin, size, or release context.
  • Models show contextual sensitivity and sycophantic shifts, raising concerns about steerability and normative reliability.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.