Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Generating in the Limit with Infinitely Many Hallucinations

Summary

The classic paradigm of language identification in the limit models learning as a game between an adversary, who reveals strings from an unknown target language, and a learner tasked with identifying that language. The recently introduced framework of language generation in the limit shifted the objective to better reflect modern language modeling, requiring the learner to produce valid, unseen strings from the target language. Related work highlighted a fundamental tension: a broad coverage of the target often comes at the cost of validity. We introduce a new notion of precision and recast this problem as the classic recall-precision trade-off. We analyze generation in the limit under varying constraints on enumeration, novelty, and validity, aimed at reflecting settings closer to those…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Irene Strauss, Alexandra Butoi, Ryan Cotterell
Generating in the Limit with Infinitely Many Hallucinations
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2606.28354] Generating in the Limit with Infinitely Many Hallucinations

[Submitted on 8 Jun 2026]

Title:Generating in the Limit with Infinitely Many Hallucinations

View a PDF of the paper titled Generating in the Limit with Infinitely Many Hallucinations, by Irene Strauss and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The classic paradigm of language identification in the limit models learning as a game between an adversary, who reveals strings from an unknown target language, and a learner tasked with identifying that language. The recently introduced framework of language generation in the limit shifted the objective to better reflect modern language modeling, requiring the learner to produce valid, unseen strings from the target language. Related work highlighted a fundamental tension: a broad coverage of the target often comes at the cost of validity. We introduce a new notion of precision and recast this problem as the classic recall-precision trade-off. We analyze generation in the limit under varying constraints on enumeration, novelty, and validity, aimed at reflecting settings closer to those encountered by large language models. A key contribution is our analysis of learners that are not eventually valid: we allow infinitely many mistakes, provided their frequency tends to zero so that precision remains one. We show that this relaxation can strictly increase recall when the adversary permanently withholds a large portion of the target language. We also study a continuous relaxation of the novelty constraint that requires only a fixed fraction of outputs to be novel. Taken together, our results move toward a more realistic model of language generation where occasional errors and repetitions are unavoidable, but their rates are controlled.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Formal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.28354 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.28354v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.28354

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Irene Strauss [view email] [v1] Mon, 8 Jun 2026 09:58:13 UTC (60 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Generating in the Limit with Infinitely Many Hallucinations, by Irene Strauss and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.FL cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Introduces precision concept, reframing generation as recall-precision trade-off
  • Allows infinitely many hallucinations with frequency tending to zero, boosting recall
  • Continuous relaxation of novelty constraint requiring a fixed fraction of novel outputs

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.