Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

FusionEval: Benchmarking Model Fusion for Large Language Models

Summary

arXiv:2610.30162v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model fusion aims to integrate the capabilities of multi-expert models into a single model. Existing evaluations offer limited coverage of reasoning with long chains of thought and tool use, while strong average performance can mask substantial losses in individual expert capabilities. We introduce FusionEval, a benchmark that provides controlled expert pools, integrates fusion methods with and without additional training, and offers a unified evaluation suite. The pools contain domain experts independently trained from Qwen3 and Llama base models across math, code, science, instruction following, and tool use. The suite evaluates capability retention and computational cost on eight public benchmarks under comparable data access rules, repor…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Shuo Cai, Yanggan Gu, Yuhang Liu, Su Lu, Yuanyi Wang, Yang Yu, Zhen Li, Zhitian Hou, Guanghao Zhu, Ming Li, Hongxia Yang
FusionEval: Benchmarking Model Fusion for Large Language Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 30 Sep 2026]

Title:FusionEval: Benchmarking Model Fusion for Large Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled FusionEval: Benchmarking Model Fusion for Large Language Models, by Shuo Cai and 10 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Model fusion aims to integrate the capabilities of multi-expert models into a single model. Existing evaluations offer limited coverage of reasoning with long chains of thought and tool use, while strong average performance can mask substantial losses in individual expert capabilities. We introduce FusionEval, a benchmark that provides controlled expert pools, integrates fusion methods with and without additional training, and offers a unified evaluation suite. The pools contain domain experts independently trained from Qwen3 and Llama base models across math, code, science, instruction following, and tool use. The suite evaluates capability retention and computational cost on eight public benchmarks under comparable data access rules, reporting normalized average and worst performance, runtime, and peak GPU memory usage. Extensive experiments show that training-free methods preserve reasoning performance but substantially degrade tool use at both model scales. In contrast, MOPD preserves tool use and achieves a more balanced capability profile, but requires additional data preparation, inference, and training. Jointly retaining reasoning, instruction following, and tool use at low computational cost remains a challenge. We hope FusionEval supports future research on efficient model fusion that jointly preserves expert capabilities. Our code is available at this https URL.

Comments: 20 pages, 4 figures

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.30162 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.30162v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.30162

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Shuo Cai [view email] [v1] Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:10:13 UTC (234 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled FusionEval: Benchmarking Model Fusion for Large Language Models, by Shuo Cai and 10 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.30162v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model fusion aims to integrate the capabilities of multi-expert models into a single model. Existing evaluations offer limited cove…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.