AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

From Weights to Words: Expressing and Editing Preference Model Inferences in Natural Language

This paper introduces 'weights to words', a method that automatically discovers natural language-described preference dimensions from choice data, addressing under-determination and opacity in preference learning. Experiments show improved prediction accuracy and enable real-time user inspection and editing.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Zachary Wojtowicz, Ayush Nayak, Jacob Andreas

-->

[Submitted on 24 Jun 2026]

Title:From Weights to Words: Expressing and Editing Preference Model Inferences in Natural Language

View a PDF of the paper titled From Weights to Words: Expressing and Editing Preference Model Inferences in Natural Language, by Zachary Wojtowicz and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The growing use of statistical learning algorithms to infer human preferences from high-dimensional choice data runs up against a fundamental challenge: choice alternatives typically differ in many ways simultaneously, so it is generally unclear which factors actually drove an observed decision and should be credited as preferences. Compounding this problem, the opacity of these methods leaves human operators unable to inspect, contest, or correct models when they err. We introduce \emph{weights to words}, a method that takes a dataset of choice problems as input and automatically discovers a collection of domain-relevant preference dimensions, each described in natural language and paired with a vector in the model's representational space. These dimensions address both under-determination and opacity: they can be applied to concentrate attribution on a small set of meaningful factors, and they can externalize the model's inferences in natural language so that users can inspect and edit them in real time. We first qualitatively illustrate the method's versatility on four diverse domains: moral dilemmas, movies, wines, and free-form LLM responses. We then report two pre-registered human-subjects experiments, on moral dilemmas ($N=450$) and movie selection ($N=449$), that demonstrate its benefits for learning preference models: (1) regularizing a preference model toward the learned basis increases prediction accuracy on held-out choices, and (2) incorporating participants' structured edits further improves accuracy. In head-to-head comparisons, participants prefer the method's inferred preference profiles and endorse its predictions as more accurate.

Comments: 42 pages, 22 figures, 14 tables; main text 11 pages, remainder appendices

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.16232 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.16232v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.16232

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zachary Wojtowicz [view email] [v1] Wed, 24 Jun 2026 04:51:55 UTC (9,476 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled From Weights to Words: Expressing and Editing Preference Model Inferences in Natural Language, by Zachary Wojtowicz and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.CL cs.HC

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)