Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

From Switching to Dynamic Regret: A Simple Reduction via Unbiased Random Sequences

Summary

arXiv:2609.20968v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In non-stationary online learning, dynamic regret has attracted increasing attention as a measure of how well an online learner performs against a time-varying comparator sequence. Despite considerable advances, attaining optimal bounds for strongly convex and exp-concave losses often involves intricate analysis. In this paper, we present a \textit{simple} framework that reduces dynamic regret minimization to switching regret minimization. As a result, we can derive dynamic regret bounds by using off-the-shelf algorithms with switching regret guarantees. The key idea of our reduction is to construct, for \textit{any} comparator sequence, an auxiliary random sequence that is unbiased at each round, with the controlled variance and a manageabl…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Yibo Wang, Wenhao Yang, Sifan Yang, Yuanyu Wan, Lijun Zhang
From Switching to Dynamic Regret: A Simple Reduction via Unbiased Random Sequences
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 17 Sep 2026]

Title:From Switching to Dynamic Regret: A Simple Reduction via Unbiased Random Sequences

View a PDF of the paper titled From Switching to Dynamic Regret: A Simple Reduction via Unbiased Random Sequences, by Yibo Wang and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:In non-stationary online learning, dynamic regret has attracted increasing attention as a measure of how well an online learner performs against a time-varying comparator sequence. Despite considerable advances, attaining optimal bounds for strongly convex and exp-concave losses often involves intricate analysis. In this paper, we present a \textit{simple} framework that reduces dynamic regret minimization to switching regret minimization. As a result, we can derive dynamic regret bounds by using off-the-shelf algorithms with switching regret guarantees. The key idea of our reduction is to construct, for \textit{any} comparator sequence, an auxiliary random sequence that is unbiased at each round, with the controlled variance and a manageable number of switches. Combining this construction with suitable surrogate losses, we can decompose dynamic regret into the expected switching regret against the random sequence and its controlled variance. Theoretically, for strongly convex and exp-concave losses, we establish the $\widetilde{O}(T^{1/3}P_T^{2/3})$ dynamic regret bounds, where $T$ denotes the time horizon and $P_T$ denotes the path-length of the comparator sequence. Moreover, for general convex losses, the same reduction also recovers the $O(\sqrt{T(1+P_T)})$ dynamic regret bound. Notably, all our findings match the minimax optimal results for these three types of losses, highlighting the versatility of our proposed framework.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.20968 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.20968v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.20968

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yibo Wang [view email] [v1] Thu, 17 Sep 2026 18:25:43 UTC (57 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled From Switching to Dynamic Regret: A Simple Reduction via Unbiased Random Sequences, by Yibo Wang and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.20968v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In non-stationary online learning, dynamic regret has attracted increasing attention as a measure of how well an online learner per…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.